Gravitational potential energy of satellites

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential and kinetic energies of two satellites, A and B, with a mass of 980 kg each, orbiting at different altitudes. The potential energy equations are derived using the formula U = -GmM/r, where r is the radius of the orbit, including Earth's radius. The user struggles with arithmetic and the correct application of the formulas, leading to incorrect energy values. Additionally, the work required to change satellite A's orbit to that of satellite B is also calculated using the formula W = GmM(1/R1 - 1/R2). Accurate calculations and careful attention to detail are emphasized for correct results.
pbumper1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two Earth satellites, A and B, each of mass each of 980kg, are launched into circular orbits around the Earth's center. Satellite A orbits at an altitude of 4500kg, and satellite B orbits at an altitude of 13600km.
What are the potential energies of the two satellites?
What are the kinetic energies of the two satellites?
How much work would it require to change the orbit of satellite A to match that of satellite B?

Homework Equations


GmM2/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried this problem several ways adding the radius of the earth, not adding the radius. I have been working on this problem for the past 3 days and can't seem to get any of it. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you've done so far.

Hint: The "r" you need is the radius of the orbit, which is the radius of the Earth plus the altitude.
 
R=6378.1+4500=R1 R=6378.1+13600=R2
R1=10878.1 R2=19978.1
U1=-6.6*10^-11x980x5.974*10^24/R1 =-3.59*10^13
U2=-" "/R2 =-1.96*10^13 got them both wrong
v^2=6.6*10^-11x980/R1
plug v^2 to 1/2mv^2 i got 2.94*10^9 and 1.6*10^9 got them both wrong

W=GmM(1/R1-1/R2)=1.60*10^13 got that wrong too
 
pbumper1 said:
R=6378.1+4500=R1 R=6378.1+13600=R2
R1=10878.1 R2=19978.1
OK.
U1=-6.6*10^-11x980x5.974*10^24/R1 =-3.59*10^13
Check your arithmetic.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top