Gravity at an arbitrary location near a disc

  • Thread starter Thread starter bumpkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating gravitational acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc with specified thickness, radius, and density. Participants suggest using symmetry and volume integrals to approach the problem, considering two cases: one for points outside the disc and another for points inside. It is noted that the gravitational field outside the disc behaves like that of a point mass at the center, while the field inside varies based on the position relative to the disc. The conversation also highlights the importance of using cylindrical coordinates for simplification. The overall consensus is that understanding the geometry of the problem is crucial for accurate calculations.
bumpkin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



calculate the gravity acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc of thickness h, radius r and density p

Homework Equations



g=Gm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



define r in terms of the vector magnitude from the measurement point to some point on the disc, then hit it with a volume integral? Is there an easier way, say using symmetry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpkin said:

Homework Statement



calculate the gravity acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc of thickness h, radius r and density p

Homework Equations



g=Gm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



define r in terms of the vector magnitude from the measurement point to some point on the disc, then hit it with a volume integral? Is there an easier way, say using symmetry?
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm assuming that rho and h are constant.

It may well be easier to tackle this problem in two separate cases: (a) When the point of interest is outside the body; and (b) when the point of interest is inside the body. For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.
 
Hootenanny said:
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm assuming that rho and h are constant.

It may well be easier to tackle this problem in two separate cases: (a) When the point of interest is outside the body; and (b) when the point of interest is inside the body. For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.

rho and h are constant. I hadn't even thought of b. But for a, I would assume the acceleration at the edge of the disc would be different to the gravity long the axis of the disc? Ie if the disc was in the xy plane, the gravity at (r,0,h) would be different to (0,0,sqrt(r^2+h^2))?
 
Hootenanny said:
For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.
That would be true for a uniform sphere, but not for a disk.
 
bumpkin said:
rho and h are constant. I hadn't even thought of b. But for a, I would assume the acceleration at the edge of the disc would be different to the gravity long the axis of the disc? Ie if the disc was in the xy plane, the gravity at (r,0,h) would be different to (0,0,sqrt(r^2+h^2))?
Oh, sorry. I assumed that you were working in 2D, in the plane of the disc. My bad.

The best option then is to transform into cylindrical coordinates. Apologies for the confusion.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top