Green function for forced harmonic oscillator

Judas503
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem requires to solve the integration to find ## G(t) ## after ##G(\omega)## is found via Fourier transform. We have G(\omega)= \frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{1}{\omega _{0}^2 - \omega ^2}

Homework Equations


As mentioned previously, the question asks to find ##G(t)##

The Attempt at a Solution


It is obvious that calculus of residues is required. To account for causality (## G(t<0)=0 ##), the poles at ## \omega=\pm \omega_{0} ## are shifted to the lower half plane by ## i\epsilon ## and integrated along the contour in the lower half plane. Then,
G(t)=-\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{e^{-i\omega t}}{(\omega +i\epsilon)^2 -\omega _{0} ^2}d\omega
After calculating the residues at ## \omega =\pm \omega _{0} - i\epsilon ##, I found
G(t)=\frac{i}{2\omega_{0}}\sin \omega_{0}t

Is my answer correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The presence of ##i## suggests it's not. G(t) should be real, shouldn't it?

The sine makes sense. The system is at rest and then you impart an impulse, causing it to oscillate. It has to be sine because it starts from x=0.
 
It looks like the i and the 2 might both get absorbed into the ##\sin \omega_0 t =\frac{e^{i \omega_0 t }-e^{-i \omega_0 t }}{2i}## term.
 
Yes, sorry! I forgot to put the "i" in the exponential form of sine. That should clear the problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top