Griffiths Electrodynamics book: Electric potential

chingcx
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from Prob. 2.25
Two point charges with separation d, P is a point at a distance z above the mid-point of the charges.
The last sentence asked if one of the positive charges is changed to a negative one, what is the potential at P? What field does it suggest? Explain the discrepancy.

Homework Equations


E = -grad V

The Attempt at a Solution


V=0 obviously
E = -grad V = 0
What is the reason behind that gives this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, -\vec{\nabla}V=\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\hat{x}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}\hat{y}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}\hat{z} Since you only know V on the z-axis, you cannot possibly calculate \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} and \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}}. Clearly, any E-field will point in the x-direction, and so it is necessary to determine V(x,y,z) at points off of the z-axis to find \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} and hence E.
 
Last edited:
I had exactly the same question and I kind of understand what you are saying but since V is scalar and E is vector, isn't V supposed to possesses all the information that the three components of E possess? Would you please suggest me how you would compute E = -\nabla V in this case and compare it with calculation using Gauss's Law?

Thanks
 
The equation \vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla}V applies to V(x,y,z) (in Cartesian coordinates anyways). The potential you've calculated is actually V(0,0,z) (the -potential on the z-axis) and so you do not know how V varies with x or y, and you cannot use V(0,0,z) to compute E. If you wanted to compute E from the potential, then you would need to find the potential at a general point (x,y,z) (or even just a point on the x-axis in this case) first and use that potential.

In some cases, you know from symmetry that E points in the z direction and so knowing the functional dependence of V(z) is enough. In this case however, E points in the x direction and so you need to know the functional dependence of V(x).
 
Thanks,

I also have another question...
Two infinite parallel plates separated by a distance s are at potential 0 and V_0
a) Use Poisson's eqn to find potential V in the region between the plates where the space charge density is rho = rho_0(x/s). The distance x is measured from the plate at 0 potential.
b)What are the charge densities in the plate?

For this problem, I started with number of ways but none of them seem to be working.
 
You should start a new thread for that problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top