GSHP - What percentage of heat energy is taken from the ground?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of ground source heat pumps (GSHP) and the percentage of heat energy derived from the ground. It is clarified that while a heat pump with a coefficient of performance (COP) of 4 can provide 4 kW of heat, only 3 kW comes from the ground, with 1 kW supplied by electrical energy for the compressor. Participants agree that the heat source is cooled by 3 kW, not 4 kW, and the conversion process does contribute additional heat to the output. Local conditions significantly influence the actual performance and efficiency of a GSHP installation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate expectations regarding heat energy sourcing.
smjpl
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am wondering about heat pumps, not necessarily ground source heat pump.

What percentage of heat is taken from the ground?

My understanding was that 100% of the heat is taken from the ground but it costs 25% (if COP of 4) in electrical energy (running the compressor) to convert the heat from low temperature heat into high temperature heat (albeit a smaller amount).

From reading some forums, some people think that if I have a 4kW heat pump and achieve a COP of 4, that the ground collector only needs to absorb 3kW of heat energy and the other 1 kW is supplied from the electricity, i.e. the compressor.

Is this correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you seen this link??
It tells you all you need to know - and agrees with your understading of it. But other factors will determine what sort of value you, personally, will get if you instal it in your home. That is much harder to estimate because it will depend very much on local conditions (wind, air and soil temperatures and soil type etc.).
 
Cheers for the reply. It answered my question but it appears I am wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance

"A geothermal heat pump operating at 3.5 provides 3.5 units of heat for each unit of energy consumed (i.e. 1 kWh consumed would provide 3.5 kWh of output heat). The output heat comes from both the heat source and 1 kWh of input energy, so the heat-source is cooled by 2.5 kWh, not 3.5 kWh."
 
You seem to be right to me. The heat source heat plus the electrical input appear as heat in your house. Isn't that what you are both saying?
 
sophiecentaur said:
You seem to be right to me. The heat source heat plus the electrical input appear as heat in your house. Isn't that what you are both saying?

No, I was thinking 100% of heat comes from ground but it costs you 25% in electrical energy to convert it into usable energy. I thought the conversion process didn't add any additional heat but it does.

i.e. if you had a 4 kW heat pump, you would cool the ground by 4 kW not 3 kW.

But just to clarify for anyone else, it does only cool the ground by 3 kW granted you have a COP of 4.
 
Yep - and that's how I read what you wrote. :smile:
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top