Guidance with some chemistry concepts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying elements using quantum numbers in AP Chemistry, specifically how to narrow down possibilities with magnetic quantum number (m) and spin number. The primary quantum number (n) and angular quantum number (l) help identify the element, but further clarification is needed on how m and spin numbers contribute to this identification. Participants emphasize that additional context about the electron's state is crucial for accurate identification. The uncertainty principle is also addressed, clarifying that "delta" represents uncertainty in measurements rather than change, and that only uncertainties are needed for calculations, not the actual values of mass or velocity. Understanding these concepts is essential for pinpointing the highest energy electron in a ground state atom.
Ritzycat
Messages
170
Reaction score
4
Hello! I understand that a lot of this may be considered physics, but It is for AP Chemistry.

We will likely be required to identify a certain element on the periodic table given a set of quantum numbers of one of its electrons. I understand the primary quantum number, n, essentially corresponds to the rows on the table. L dictates the type of orbital (s, p, d, etc.). But I am confused on how I can further narrow it down using magnetic quantum number (m) and spin number.

For example, I know n=2, l=0 would be either Lithium or Beryllium. What would be the m / spin numbers for each? Essentially, we are being asked to pinpoint a certain element on the table given 4 quantum numbers. I understand how to narrow it down using the primary quantum number and angular quantum number but do not understand how I can further narrow it down using magnetic quantum number and spin number.

Sorry if that question is a little discombobulated, hopefully it makes sense.

My other concern is the uncertainty principle. How are we meant to do calculations using the uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tain't too "discombobulated" to understand your concern. You will have to be given additional information about the electron for which quantum numbers are given, whether the atom is in its ground state, and possibly more; for instance, "n=2, l=0" covers everything from excited H (or He) through the transuranics. Presumably you'll be told it's the highest energy electron in a ground state atom, and judging from your presentation of the question you won't have much trouble. Transition metals and lanthanides might get a little weird depending on how much cribbing material you're allowed.

Uncertainty? What sort of calculations are you being asked/expected to handle?
 
Yes - I think that's correct. We are going to be expected to pinpoint the highest energy electron in the ground state atom, and we'll have to identify what element that would be based on a set of 4 numbers. However, I'm not sure how I can use the 3rd and 4th numbers to identify what element we are talking about.

As for uncertainty, the "delta" for each X and MV mean uncertainty, not change, like delta normally means, correct? I don't actually need the value for mass or velocity itself to solve for the other, only its uncertainty?
 
If you're given a set of quantum numbers, you have been given the order in which the quantum levels are filled, have you not, and can then count electrons.

"Δ" indicates uncertainty, yes, and those uncertainties are the values you use.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
879
Back
Top