Half-Life of He-6 Nucleus: 40 GeV

  • Thread starter Thread starter sawhai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Half life Life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the half-life of a He-6 nucleus with a total energy of 40 GeV. The user initially calculates the mass of He-6 using E=mc², resulting in approximately 4.25 amu. They then apply the concept of time dilation, using the Lorentz factor (gamma) to find the half-life based on the stationary half-life value. Additionally, the user poses a question about the energy of an electron after a collision and whether it can ionize a tungsten atom, concluding that the energy of the recoiling electron is relevant for ionization. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying relativistic principles and energy calculations in nuclear physics.
sawhai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question asks: "What is the half-life of a He-6 nucleus with total(kinetic+rest) energy E=40 GeV?"

How can we approach this problem?


Homework Equations



E=mc2 ;


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought of getting the mass of the He-6 using M=E/c2 =>40GeV/931.5MeV = 4.25 amu = 7.05*10^-26 kg. I am not sure if this helps and what to do next.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi sawhai! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

my guess is that you're supposed to find the speed, and then use time dilation to find the half-life (looking up the stationary half-life in a table)
 
Ok, I think I now understand. Here is what I did:

Gamma = E/mc^2 = 40GeV/6*931.5MeV = 7.15

t1/2 = t1/2 (Stationary)*gamma = 7.15*807ms

Does this sound ok?
 
looks ok! :smile:
 
Thanks. Now another question

An electron accelerated to 106 keV colides with another free electron and recoils. Its energy after the collision is 26 keV.
(a) What is the energy of the other electron that was initially at rest? I said E=106-26=80keV
(b)Assume the target electron is from the innermost shell of a Tungsten atom. Is the bound electron ionized in this collision? (the potential energy of the Tungsten ground state is 70keV). I said yes because 106keV is more than 70keV

Do you see any thing wrong with these answers?

Thanks
 
For b it is not because 106 is larger than 70, but because 80 is larger than 70.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top