(Hard QM) Consider the double well potential with delta func

NucEngMajor
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the double well potential with two wells separated by delta function in middle.

V(x) = V0 > 0 for x<-a and x>a
0 for -a<x<0 and 0<x<a
αδ for x =0
1. Find Bound state energies
2. Find odd solns and their eigenvalue equation. Give solns in graphical form
3. Repeat 2. for even
4. Plot two lowest order even and odd soln

Homework Equations


S.E

The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote down BC's noting discontinuity at delta and obtained 6 equations (think they are right?). Prof said to use the fact that the determinant of system must vanish to get energy eigenvalue equation. I don't know how to go about this. I know the other way would be incredibly long and tedious.
Aexp(-la) = Csin(-ka)+Dcos(-ka)
lAexp(-la) = Ckcos(-ka)-Dksin(-ka)
Gexp(-la) = Esin(ka) + Fcos(ka)
-lGexp(-la) = Ekcos(ka) - Fksin(ka)
D=F
k(E-C)=2mαF/h^2 (h is "h bar")[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
 
vela said:
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
How does one go about constructing M from this? Not looking for answer, but I quite honestly don't know how to start...
 
The same way you convert, for example, the equations
\begin{align*}
x' &= x \cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\
y' &= x \sin\theta + y \cos\theta
\end{align*}
to
$$\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}$$
 
NucEngMajor,

You can greatly reduce the number of unknowns by using the fact that your wavefunctions are either even or odd. If you know the wavefunction for x ≥ 0, you automatically know the wavefunction for x < 0. Then, if you want to use the matrix approach, your matrix will be just 3 x 3 instead of 6 x 6.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vela
Ended up using algebra and getting a sensible answer. Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top