Heat Dissipation in Resistors: Does Direction Matter?

AI Thread Summary
Heat dissipation in resistors primarily depends on the square of the current magnitude and the resistance, making direction seemingly irrelevant in typical scenarios. However, certain effects, such as the Peltier and Thomson effects, illustrate that direction can influence heat transfer in specific materials, particularly semiconductors or junctions of dissimilar metals. These effects can lead to Peltier heating or cooling based on current direction, which does not occur in standard resistors. Overall, while conventional resistors do not exhibit directional heat dissipation, specialized materials can demonstrate this phenomenon. Understanding these nuances is crucial for applications involving thermoelectric effects.
sArGe99
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Does the heat dissipated in a resistor necessarily depend on the direction of current through it? As far as I know the heat dissipated equals square of the magnitude of current thru resistor multiplied the resistance of the resistor. But it seems direction matters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sArGe99 said:
But it seems direction matters.
Why do you think direction matters? Can you give an example?
 
Squaring the current makes the direction irrelevant. Are you imagining a case where it would matter?
 
Peltier effect, Thomson effect. There's both Peltier heating and Peltier cooling depending on the direction of current.
 
You won't find such effects with an ordinary resistor. You need a semiconductor or a junction of dissimilar metals.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top