Heat Flow in Three Identical Rods of Metal

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about heat flow in three identical rods forming an isosceles triangle, it is established that the temperature at point C is calculated as 3T/(1+√2). The rate of heat flow in rod BA is equal to that in rod BC, not CA, as initially suggested. The temperature gradient across rods BA and BC is confirmed to be the same. Some participants question the validity of the triangle's configuration and the temperature calculation at point C. Overall, both statements regarding heat flow and temperature gradients are affirmed as correct.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three rods of identical cross-sectional area are made from the same metal, form the sides of an isosceles triangle ABC right angled at B. The points A and B are maintained at temperature T and √2 T respectively in steady state. Assume that only heat conduction takes place. Then

a) Rate of heat flow in BA is equal to rate of heat flow in CA

b) Temperature gradient across CA is equal to the temperature gradient across BA


The Attempt at a Solution



I got the temperature at C as 3T/1+√2.

Temperature at B > Temperature at A.
Rate of flow in BA will be equal to the rate of heat flow in BCA (not CA)
Again temperature gradient will be same across BCA

Both a and b are correct. I don't understand how. Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul Quadeer said:

Homework Statement


Three rods of identical cross-sectional area are made from the same metal, form the sides of an isosceles triangle ABC right angled at B.
How can isosceles triangle ABC be right angled at B?
 
Your calculation of temperature at C is wrong.
The two statements are true for BA and BC, rather BA and CA.
Check the problem.
 
How can isosceles triangle ABC be right angled at B?

Take a look at the figure.

Your calculation of temperature at C is wrong.

I found the temperature at C by equating the rate of heat flow through BC and CA.
I got the same answer after checking.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 415
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top