Heat Transfer - Massflow in a pipe vs pipe at constant T

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the heat transfer dynamics in a pipe embedded in a cement block for snow melting applications. The original model assumed that a fast-moving fluid would maintain a constant temperature, leading to minimal temperature change. However, a physics teacher argued that increased mass flow rates enhance heat transfer due to greater temperature differentials. The key point is that while faster flow reduces the temperature change of the fluid, it can still improve heat flux from the pipe to the surrounding concrete. Understanding the relationship between flow rate and heat transfer efficiency is crucial for optimizing such systems.
KevinMilo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Had a physics project in university that looked at the heat transfer of a pipe in a cement block for snow melting. When I modeled it using computational fluid dynamics, I just did a 2D model and simplified it by saying that the fluid would be moving fast enough through the pipe that the temperature change of the fluid in the circuit would be very small.

One of the physics teachers disagreed. He said that with faster mass flow rates that I'd get more heat transfer. Can you not make the assumption that if its moving fast enough to keep the temperature of the pipe constant, than faster flow rates won't increase the heat flux from the pipe to the concrete?

Thanks in advance! I'm sure this is a pretty easy question for most of you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Faster flow would mean the temperature change of the fluid would be less.

But, as your teacher stated, heat transfer which depends on temperature differences would be higher.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top