Heating a room and internal energy question

sbdavinci
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having a hard time answering this question. Any help will be appreciated.
In 1938, the journal Nature published a paper by R. Emden titled “Why do we have winter heating?” (Nature Vol 141 pp. 908-9 – although you do not need to read it to answer the problem). This article asserts that heating a room does not increase the total internal energy of the room. Examine this assertion assuming:

(a) the room is filled with an ideal gas
(b) the volume of the room is fixed
(c) the pressure of the room is variable and set by the external atmosphere.
(i) Show that the internal energy of the room is independent of the temperature of the room!
(ii) What state variables change with temperature in order to maintain constant internal energy? How are they affected by temperature (derive an equation to describe this)?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on the assumptions for constant values in the statement: If you rearrange the ideal gas equation to substitute the variable terms in the formula for internal energy, maybe you are able to see how the internal energy changes with varying temperature.
 
If the temperature rises by ΔT, what is the change in the internal energy per mole? If the temperature rises by ΔT, what is the change in the number of moles of gas in the room?

Chet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top