Heisenberg Uncertainty Maximum Lifetime of Photon

diggleM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In special conditions, it is possible to measure the energy of a gamma ray photon to 1 part in 10^15. For a photon energy of 50 keV, estimate the maximum lifetime that could be determined be a direct measurement of the spread of photon energy.


Homework Equations


ΔtΔE≥\hbar/2


The Attempt at a Solution



It seems simple enough using the given equation to solve for the maximum lifetime, however I'm not sure I'm understanding how the relative uncertainty of 1 part in 10^15 effects the problem. If someone would be able to explain how the relative uncertainty effects the calculation to me, it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diggleM said:
I'm not sure I'm understanding how the relative uncertainty of 1 part in 10^15 effects the problem.
Take another look at Heisenbergs relation - what do each of the terms mean?
 
The way I understand it, they can be thought of as terms of uncertainty for time and energy, which are inversely related. That is to say, if you measure the Energy to a high level of certainty, the level of uncertainty will be high as well.

Looking back in my text describing the relation, it mentions that if a particle has a definite energy, ΔE = 0. This leads me to thinking that to solve a value for ΔE, you could find the relative uncertainty where Relative Uncertainty = | uncertainty/measured quantity|, in this case the relative uncertainty would be 10^15 and measured quantity would be 50,000 eV, to solve for the uncertainty, ΔE, which could be used to solve for Δt.

These are still pretty new concepts to me so I'm not sure if that is an appropriate mode of thinking about this. Does that seems to makes sense or do you see flaws in my thought process?
 
If you know a measurement x to 1 part in 1000 then the relative uncertainty would be about 1/1000 and the uncertainty would be Δx=x/1000.

Use a value of planks constant in units of keV.(time) to avoid conversions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top