Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - find minimum uncertainty in position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum uncertainty in position for a football with a known speed and uncertainty. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is referenced, emphasizing that certain parameters cannot be precisely measured simultaneously. The uncertainty in velocity (du) is directly provided as 1 mm/s, which should be converted to meters for calculations. The formula dx ≥ h/(4∏mdu) is correctly applied, leading to a calculated uncertainty in position of approximately 1.21e-31 meters. The importance of using SI units for consistency in calculations is also highlighted.
daleklama
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume speed of 435g football is known with 1mm/s uncertainty.
What is the minimum uncertainty in its position?

Homework Equations



I'm not quite sure... I know p=mv, and I know that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that certain parameters of quantum particles cannot be measured/known at the same time without uncertainty.

When I did a previous example, I used the formula:

dx ≥ h/(4∏mdu)
where dx = uncertainty in position
h = Plancks constant
m = mass in kg
du = uncertainty in velocity


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I was trying to do it using the formula given above, but there are a couple of things I don't understand.
i) How do I find du?
I previously found du by multiplying the speed (given in question) by the uncertainty, which was in percentage form.
How do I find du now? I'm not actually GIVEN a speed, and I don't quite know what to make of "1mm/s uncertainty." Is that 0.001%, which would be 0.00001, or...?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daleklama said:

Homework Statement



Assume speed of 435g football is known with 1mm/s uncertainty.
What is the minimum uncertainty in its position?

Homework Equations



I'm not quite sure... I know p=mv, and I know that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that certain parameters of quantum particles cannot be measured/known at the same time without uncertainty.

When I did a previous example, I used the formula:

dx ≥ h/(4∏mdu)
where dx = uncertainty in position
h = Plancks constant
m = mass in kg
du = uncertainty in velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I was trying to do it using the formula given above, but there are a couple of things I don't understand.
i) How do I find du?
I previously found du by multiplying the speed (given in question) by the uncertainty, which was in percentage form.
How do I find du now? I'm not actually GIVEN a speed, and I don't quite know what to make of "1mm/s uncertainty." Is that 0.001%, which would be 0.00001, or...?

Thanks :)

The uncertainty appearing in the uncertainty principle is always a quantity with units of position or speed, not a dimensionless ratio (or percentage) of quantities. In this case, the uncertainty in the velocity is given to you directly in the problem. The actual velocity is irrelevant for the application of the uncertainty principle, in cases where you know the uncertainty directly. The actual velocity is only relevant when you use it to infer what the uncertainty in the velocity must be (e.g. if you are a given a problem that says "the velocity of the football is measured to be 10.000 m/s -- in which case you are being indirectly told the uncertainty in that measurement).
 
Okay, I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but in that case, would the following be a correct calculation?

dx ≥ h/(4∏mdu)
where dx = uncertainty in position
h = Plancks constant
m = mass in kg
du = uncertainty in velocity

dx ≥ (6.626e-34)/(4∏(0.435)(0.001)
dx ≥ 1.21e-31 m


I used 0.001 as the uncertainty because it's given as 1 mm/s, and I felt I should convert that to metres?

Thanks very much for reply :)
 
Yes, this is fine. Certainly you do want to have the velocity uncertainty in SI units if your other units will be too.
 
Thank you :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top