Hello, can somebody check my transistor amplifier schematic?
- Thread starter michael1978
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around a transistor amplifier schematic, specifically focusing on the use of a BFG520 transistor and its replacement, along with the circuit's functionality and design considerations. Participants explore the circuit's purpose, component connections, and performance issues, including the use of a varactor diode for tuning frequencies in a radio receiver context.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks help with a schematic that is not functioning, particularly due to the absence of a BFG520 transistor.
- Another participant suggests finding an equivalent transistor and adjusting other components accordingly.
- Questions arise about the circuit's intended function and the specifics of the input signal.
- Participants discuss the role of the 2V DC bias source for the varactor diode and its effect on resonance in the LC tank circuit.
- There is uncertainty about the input frequency and how to adjust the varactor to achieve the desired tuning range.
- Some participants propose using a transformer for better signal coupling in the circuit.
- Clarifications are sought regarding the circuit's classification as part of a radio receiver or transmitter.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express various viewpoints on the circuit's design and functionality, with no clear consensus on the best approach to resolve the issues presented. Multiple competing views on the use of components and circuit configuration remain evident throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention the need for specific voltage levels for the varactor diode and the implications of using different types of capacitors. There are unresolved questions about the circuit's performance and the correct implementation of the components.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in electronics design, particularly those working with RF circuits, transistor amplifiers, and tuning mechanisms in radio receivers, may find this discussion relevant.
- 15,681
- 10,475
What did you replace the BFG520 transistor with? It seems you need to find an equivalent transistor or one that's similar and adjust the other compoenets as well.
I'm not skilled in electronics per se and can't comment beyond this. However, I figured other PF members would need to know what I'm asking here.
It seems thay are still selling this transistor:
https://www.nxp.com/products/rf/rf-...nsistors/npn-9-ghz-wideband-transistor:BFG520
- 434
- 19
one question, can you compare with mine circuits is everything ok, except transistor?jedishrfu said:Can you provide some context here? What is the circuit for?
What did you replace the BFG520 transistor with? It seems you need to find an equivalent transistor or one that's similar and adjust the other compoenets as well.
I'm not skilled in electronics per se and can't comment beyond this. However, I figured other PF members would need to know what I'm asking here.
It seems thay are still selling this transistor:
https://www.nxp.com/products/rf/rf-...nsistors/npn-9-ghz-wideband-transistor:BFG520
Attachments
- 69,479
- 25,004
When you say the circuit "is not working", what do you mean? Can you plot the DC solution? Are you trying to run a transient analysis? If so, what is your input signal?
- 434
- 19
berkeman said:Both schematics look basically okay to me. Is L1 supposed to be coupling to an antenna as the signal input?
When you say the circuit "is not working", what do you mean? Can you plot the DC solution? Are you trying to run a transient analysis? If so, what is your input signal?


, I forgot to add signal, but if i put 1 v output is 313mV is okej?- 69,479
- 25,004
No, this is an AC amplifier, with an assumed input source somewhere around L1.michael1978 said:but if i put 1 v output is 313mV is okej?
- 69,479
- 25,004
- 434
- 19
Sorry one more question, is not working so good varactor because, in document the say min 0.8v and max 6V to change resonance, i don't undrestand, so input frequency must be 100MHZ right?berkeman said:The 2V DC bias source is for setting the capacitance of that varacter diode, to make the input LC tank circuit resonate at the frequency of interest... It is not a signal input source.
- 69,479
- 25,004
And the 2V bias is right in the middle of that range, right? You will fine-tune that input DC voltage to get the right LC resonance...michael1978 said:is not working so good varactor because, in document the say min 0.8v and max 6V to change resonance
That's about what the output filter is tuned for, so yes.michael1978 said:so input frequency must be 100MHZ right?
- 434
- 19
input simichael1978 said:Sorry one more question, is not working so good varactor because, in document the say min 0.8v and max 6V to change resonance, i don't undrestand, so input frequency must be 100MHZ right?
Please sorry, for what we use te varactor? to tune from 88mhz to 108mhz right of not? why i can't change the frequency, can you explain more clear please, what input dc voltage you mean for varactor diode to change capacitance to tune to another station, because i read varactor with dc input increase and decrase the capacitance of varactor, and i put to 2v , do i need to put potentiometer to connect with varactor, of, how suppose to be working like this?, to change frequenceberkeman said:And the 2V bias is right in the middle of that range, right? You will fine-tune that input DC voltage to get the right LC resonance...
That's about what the output filter is tuned for, so yes.
- 69,479
- 25,004
Yes, the reverse bias voltage of any diode changes its capacitance (because it changes the width of the depletion layer). The higher the reverse bias voltage, the wider the depletion layer and hence the lower the capacitance of the diode.michael1978 said:Please sorry, for what we use the varactor? to tune from 88mhz to 108mhz right of not?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varicap
You could use a hand-turned variable capacitor for that input tuning stage, or you can use a voltage-controlled varactor diode to change the input capacitance to fine-tune the input resonant frequency.
So L1 is part of the antenna input circuit, right?
- 434
- 19
But i use already varacator(voltage-controlled varactor), what i have to do more, because i want to use varactor, there is not more in use so much variable capacitor, what i need to change to work varactor can you help me,the L1 is part of oscillator, and i put signal between L1 and Right leads of capacitor C3berkeman said:This is a similar
Yes, the reverse bias voltage of any diode changes its capacitance (because it changes the width of the depletion layer). The higher the reverse bias voltage, the wider the depletion layer and hence the lower the capacitance of the diode.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varicap
You could use a hand-turned variable capacitor for that input tuning stage, or you can use a voltage-controlled varactor diode to change the input capacitance to fine-tune the input resonant frequency.
So L1 is part of the antenna input circuit, right?
- 69,479
- 25,004
Sorry, I'm not able to understand what you said. It sounds like you have used varactor diodes before, and now you need to use one in this circuit. It is shown correctly in the circuit, as far as I can tell.michael1978 said:But i use already varacator(voltage-controlled varactor), what i have to do more, because i want to use varactor, there is not more in use so much variable capacitor, what i need to change to work varactor can you help me
If L1 is the secondary of a tuned antenna transformer, then coupling the input signal into the circuit single-ended with a connection between L1 and C3 does not work the same way. It's better to use a transformer for L1 to couple the input signal in differentially across L1.michael1978 said:L1 is part of oscillator, and i put signal between L1 and Right leads of capacitor C3
- 434
- 19
L1 is part of oscillator? i don't know relyberkeman said:Sorry, I'm not able to understand what you said. It sounds like you have used varactor diodes before, and now you need to use one in this circuit. It is shown correctly in the circuit, as far as I can tell.
If L1 is the secondary of a tuned antenna transformer, then coupling the input signal into the circuit single-ended with a connection between L1 and C3 does not work the same way. It's better to use a transformer for L1 to couple the input signal in differentially across L1.
, if i know i will tell you, me i just take from that picture, which i post it
, i think is part of oscillator- 434
- 19
- 69,479
- 25,004
- 69,479
- 25,004
Is the circuit meant to be part of a radio receiver or a radio transmitter? Can you show us where you got the circuit from?michael1978 said:L1 is part of oscillator? i don't know rely, if i know i will tell you, me i just take from that picture, which i post it
, i think is part of oscillator
- 434
- 19
Is party of local oscillator in fm supere heter receiver, he do simulation ind ads2011berkeman said:Can you post a copy of your simulation schematic with the DC bias points labeled? Which version of SPICE are you using to simulate your circuit?
- 69,479
- 25,004
Please provide a link to where you got it. Thanks.michael1978 said:Is party of local oscillator in fm supere heter receiver, he do simulation ind ads2011
- 434
- 19
from hereberkeman said:Is the circuit meant to be part of a radio receiver or a radio transmitter? Can you show us where you got the circuit from?
https://www.eit.lth.se/fileadmin/eit/courses/eti041/VT2012/04a.pdf
- 434
- 19
from hereberkeman said:Please provide a link to where you got it. Thanks.![]()
https://www.eit.lth.se/fileadmin/eit/courses/eti041/VT2012/04a.pdf
- 69,479
- 25,004
Ah, it's a Clapp oscillator, not a receiver amplifier. Got it. I haven't used SPICE to simulate oscillators in the past, but I'm guessing you need to find the DC bias points with the oscillator part disabled, and then let it run starting at that DC bias point. It might take an initial (small) impulse input to start the oscillation going, though.michael1978 said:
I'll google some for SPICE simulations of transistor oscillators to see if there are other tips suggested...
- 434
- 19
But i build in multisim, but is no problem i will build also in LTSPICEberkeman said:Ah, it's a Clapp oscillator, not a receiver amplifier. Got it. I haven't used SPICE to simulate oscillators in the past, but I'm guessing you need to find the DC bias points with the oscillator part disabled, and then let it run starting at that DC bias point. It might take an initial (small) impulse input to start the oscillation going, though.
I'll google some for SPICE simulations of transistor oscillators to see if there are other tips suggested...
- 434
- 19
Hello i start to build in LTSPICE so first i put varactor, but there is no bby40, i have only that in multisimberkeman said:Ah, it's a Clapp oscillator, not a receiver amplifier. Got it. I haven't used SPICE to simulate oscillators in the past, but I'm guessing you need to find the DC bias points with the oscillator part disabled, and then let it run starting at that DC bias point. It might take an initial (small) impulse input to start the oscillation going, though.
I'll google some for SPICE simulations of transistor oscillators to see if there are other tips suggested...
what do you think why is not working in multisim
- 69,479
- 25,004
The search comes up with lots of useful ideas. Here's the google hit list:berkeman said:I'll google some for SPICE simulations of transistor oscillators to see if there are other tips suggested...
https://www.google.com/search?q=spi...illators&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1
And this PDF has a nice idea for the forcing function to use to "kick start" the oscillator:
https://m.eet.com/media/1148991/22768-52799di.pdf (see page 110 in the PDF version)
They use a damped oscillator input signal to kick start the oscillator and then let the oscillator circuit continue on its own after the exciting waveform dies out. Nice idea...
Attachments
- 434
- 19
Thank you very much for time and helpingberkeman said:The search comes up with lots of useful ideas. Here's the google hit list:
https://www.google.com/search?q=spi...illators&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1
And this PDF has a nice idea for the forcing function to use to "kick start" the oscillator:
https://m.eet.com/media/1148991/22768-52799di.pdf (see page 110 in the PDF version)
They use a damped oscillator input signal to kick start the oscillator and then let the oscillator circuit continue on its own after the exciting waveform dies out. Nice idea...
View attachment 228449
- 434
- 19
have a nice wekend,michael1978 said:Thank you very much for time and helping
in multisim you don't know ok, because i start to build, i did not find the type of varactor but leave i make you tired, thank a lootttttttttttttttttttt,
maybe somebody else know more about multisim
greetings

- 434
- 19
but like i say to him i build in multsim circuit, and i try to build in ltspice but he does not have the type of varactor and transistor
- 69,479
- 25,004
Can you post your Multisim circuit with the DC operating points labeled? If the simulator can analyze circuits, it can show the DC operating points that it calculates at the start of a simulation...michael1978 said:i build in multsim circuit
Good. Simulating circuits is much more commonly done in some variety of SPICE. It looks like Multisim is targeted at simulating larger systems (including circuits -- I wonder if they use some standard Berkeley SPICE engine to do that part of their simulations)...michael1978 said:i start to build in LTSPICE
- 434
- 19
Can i do it tomorow, i am tired its 1clock night, sorry goodnight have a nice day or sleepberkeman said:Can you post your Multisim circuit with the DC operating points labeled? If the simulator can analyze circuits, it can show the DC operating points that it calculates at the start of a simulation...
Good. Simulating circuits is much more commonly done in some variety of SPICE. It looks like Multisim is targeted at simulating larger systems (including circuits -- I wonder if they use some standard Berkeley SPICE engine to do that part of their simulations)...
Similar threads
- · Replies 4 ·
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 68
- Views
- 7K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 4 ·
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 7 ·
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 1 ·
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 23 ·
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 28 ·
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 6K