The Mystery: Calculating Values for a Full Wave Bridge Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shahil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating values for a full-wave bridge rectifier circuit, which converts AC to DC using four diodes. Key equations include determining peak AC voltage, peak DC voltage, capacitor charging time, and ripple voltage. Specific values provided include a zener voltage of 3.9V, a resistor of 1100 ohms, and a capacitor of 1000uF. The calculations yield a peak AC voltage of 169.7V, a peak DC voltage of 169V, a capacitor charging time of 2.2 seconds, and a ripple voltage of 1.41V. This information is crucial for optimizing the circuit's performance.
Shahil
Messages
115
Reaction score
21
Help! Full Wave Bridge!

Hi guys!

Okay - I know that this is a straight-forward intermediate level circuit theory problem but uh...I've forgotten how to do it so I need help!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

I have a full-wave rectifying bridge connected to a rectifying cap and a regulating zener diode. I do have values for the cap/zener/resistor (worked out through trial and error) but: What equations do you use to work out values for this circuit? I've looked all over the net and couple textbook but can't seem to find any good information on it! If it does help,
Please help people - I really need to figure this out!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Note on pic:
Zener = 3.9V
R = 1100 ohms
C = 1000uF

Only the non-inverted coloured part of the circuit is the part that is concerend in my question. :smile:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having the same problem with my powersupply circuit. Some people have suggested to use 4700uF in the rectifying caps... but I have no idea what the theory behind it is... I've just worked mine by trial & error in some simulation software called "Protel 99".
 


Hi there,

No need to panic, let's break it down step by step. The full-wave bridge circuit is used to convert alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) by utilizing four diodes in a bridge configuration. This allows for a more efficient conversion compared to a half-wave rectifier.

To calculate the values for this circuit, we need to use the following equations:

1. Peak AC voltage (Vp) = RMS AC voltage (Vrms) x √2
2. Peak DC voltage (Vdc) = Vp - Vd (where Vd is the voltage drop across the diode, typically around 0.7V)
3. Capacitor charging time (t) = 2 x R x C (where R is the resistor value in ohms and C is the capacitor value in farads)
4. Ripple voltage (Vr) = Vdc / (2 x f x C) (where f is the frequency of the AC input)

Using these equations, we can calculate the values for the circuit in your picture.

1. Vp = Vrms x √2 = 120V x √2 = 169.7V
2. Vdc = Vp - Vd = 169.7V - 0.7V = 169V
3. t = 2 x R x C = 2 x 1100 ohms x 1000uF = 2.2 seconds
4. Vr = Vdc / (2 x f x C) = 169V / (2 x 60Hz x 1000uF) = 1.41V

Therefore, the values for your circuit are as follows:
- Peak AC voltage = 169.7V
- Peak DC voltage = 169V
- Capacitor charging time = 2.2 seconds
- Ripple voltage = 1.41V

I hope this helps! If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top