Help me calculate venturi flow rate

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flow rate change in a venturi, the principle of conservation of mass applies, meaning the flow rate must remain constant throughout the pipe. Given an opening diameter of 2m narrowing to 1m, the flow speed increases as the cross-sectional area decreases. With seawater entering at a tidal flow speed of 2.5 m/s, the speed in the narrower section will be four times greater due to the area ratio. This principle holds true even in an open venturi pipe facing tidal flow. The flow rate remains consistent across different sections of the pipe, confirming the calculations.
declanka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi I have a challenge (Its over 30 years since I did physics). I have the following information and I want to calculate the flow rate change .

Opening diameter 2m , narrows smoothly to diameter 1m. Seawater, tidal flow of 2.5 m/s into the opening, what is the effective flow rate in the throat of the venturi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi declanka! welcome to pf! :smile:

water is incompressible, so the flow rate (volume per second) must be constant, so the speed (metres per second) must be inversely proportional to cross-section area :wink:

(and in this case, the area is 1/4, so the speed must be x 4)
 
Thanks for this response, it logically confirms the calculations I came up with. Is the formula always true , even in the scenario where its just an open venturi (narrowing) pipe facing into the tidal flow .
 
declanka said:
Is the formula always true , even in the scenario where its just an open venturi (narrowing) pipe facing into the tidal flow .

yes, it's conservation of mass …

the water can't bunch up anywhere, or thin out, so the flow into any part of the pipe must be the same as the flow out of it … ie the flow rate (volume per second) past any two cross-sections must be the same
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top