How Do Relativity Principles Apply to Moving Clocks on a Train Platform?

  • Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sr
In summary: The clocks are synchronized so that both read 4:00.What's the problem? This just means that the two clocks are simultaneously (in the frame of the platform) aligned with the front and back of the train.That's all.
  • #1
neutrino
2,094
2

Homework Statement



A train passes a platform with velocity v. Two clocks are placed on the edge of the platform separated by a distance L and synchronized relative to the platform inertial system. Clock 1 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the front of the train, and clock 2 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the rear of the train. Answer questions relative to an observer on the train. [Emphasis mine]

(a) What is the length of the train?

(b) What is the reading of the clock 2 when clock 1 coincides with the front of the train?

(c) What is the time interval between the two end events?


Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations


The Attempt at a Solution


Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question. Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).

2. If it refers to observations from the train, then it seems to me to be in contradiction with what the author says a few pages earlier. It is proved that given a pair of clocks, which are synchronised in a frame in which they are at rest, moving in the the same direction and separated in space, the leading clock lags behind the trailing one(the exact amound being Lv/c2, L- measured distance between clocks). If that is true, then howcome clock 1(leading clock) reads 4:00 before clock 2(trailing).

What am I missing? :confused:


For those interested, this is problem 2.4 from Richard Mould's Basic Relativity (Springer).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
neutrino said:

Homework Statement



A train passes a platform with velocity v. Two clocks are placed on the edge of the platform separated by a distance L and synchronized relative to the platform inertial system. Clock 1 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the front of the train, and clock 2 reads 4:00 when it coincides with the rear of the train. Answer questions relative to an observer on the train. [Emphasis mine]

(a) What is the length of the train?

(b) What is the reading of the clock 2 when clock 1 coincides with the front of the train?

(c) What is the time interval between the two end events?


Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations


The Attempt at a Solution


Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question. Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).
what's the problem? This just means that the two clocks are simultaneously (in the frame of the platform) aligned with the front and back of the train.
That's all.

(this means that the distance between the two clocks (mesured in the frame of the platform) gives the length of the train as measured in the frame of the platform)

I don't understand your objection. The two events are different but they occur at the same time (in the frame of the platform). There is no problem with that.

Regards
 
  • #3
neutrino said:
Before answering a, b and c, I actually need to understand this question.

I assume that a, b, and c all deal with quantities measured in the frame of the train.

Here are my qualms:

1. If the part of the question in bold refers to observations from the platform frame, then I don't understand how the clocks can be synchronised. The clocks read 4:00 at different times(events).

(Edit: As nrqed has said,) In the frame of the platform, the front passing clock 1 and the rear passing clock 2 are simultaneous events (i.e., they happen at the same time) that happen at different places in space.

2. If it refers to observations from the train, then it seems to me to be in contradiction with what the author says a few pages earlier. It is proved that given a pair of clocks, which are synchronised in a frame in which they are at rest, moving in the the same direction and separated in space, the leading clock lags behind the trailing one(the exact amound being Lv/c2, L- measured distance between clocks). If that is true, then howcome clock 1(leading clock) reads 4:00 before clock 2(trailing).

This applies to the times of the clocks as observed in the frame of the train, not as observed in the frame of the platform.

It might help to draw a spcetime diagram with, say, the platform frame unprimed and the train frame primed. In my diagram, I took clock 2 to be the spatial origin of the unprimed frame, and clock 1 to have a spatial position x = L. I took the back of the train to be at the spatial origin of the primed frame.

Now, draw a spacetime diagram that shows the worllines of clock 2, clock 1, back of train, front of train. What are the important events on this diagram?
 
  • #4
*Slaps forehead* :redface:

I think this confusion arose because I numbered those clocks differently.

George Jones said:
In my diagram, I took clock 2 to be the spatial origin of the unprimed frame, and clock 1 to have a spatial position x = L. I took the back of the train to be at the spatial origin of the primed frame.

Put clock 1 at the origin of the platform frame and let the front end of the train, moving to the right, meet it at 4:00, and then you'll see why I was confused. :biggrin: Thanks, guys. Your help is much appreciated.
 

1. What is the purpose of an SR question?

The purpose of an SR (Systematic Review) question is to identify and summarize all available evidence on a specific topic in order to inform decision making and guide future research.

2. How are SR questions formulated?

SR questions are formulated using the PICO framework, which stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome. This framework helps researchers to clearly define the key elements of their question and identify relevant studies.

3. What makes a good SR question?

A good SR question should be specific, relevant, and answerable using existing evidence. It should also be focused on a single intervention or comparison, and clearly define the desired outcomes.

4. How do SR questions differ from traditional research questions?

SR questions differ from traditional research questions in that they are broader and more inclusive. They aim to summarize all available evidence on a topic, rather than just the findings of a single study.

5. Can SR questions be used in any field of study?

Yes, SR questions can be used in any field of study where there is a need to synthesize existing evidence on a specific topic. They are commonly used in healthcare, but can also be applied to fields such as education, social sciences, and environmental studies.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
724
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
609
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
670
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
990
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top