Help Needed: Solving Homework Equations Without Enough Variables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two physics homework problems where the original poster feels there are insufficient variables to solve them. The first problem involves calculating the work done on a baseball thrown at 35 m/s, while the second concerns determining the force needed to stop a 2000lb car over 100ft. Participants suggest using the work-energy theorem to approach both problems, indicating that this method can provide the necessary relationships between variables. The original poster expresses confusion over missing information, particularly time and velocity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of applying the work-energy theorem to solve these types of physics problems effectively.
krash91
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'd love some help with these problems, its seems to me that there aren't enough variables.

Homework Statement


A .145kg baseball leaves a pitcher's hand at a speed of 35 m/s. If air drag is negligible, how much work has the pitcher done on the ball by throwing it?


Homework Equations


W=FD


The Attempt at a Solution


W=(MA)(VT)

Seems like I can't solve it without the time it was in the air.

And this one as well

Homework Statement


Find the force needed for friction in the tires of a 2000lb car to stop it in 100ft

Homework Equations


W=FD?

The Attempt at a Solution


Again, it seems like there aren't enough varibles. If I had the velocity of the car then it would make sense.

Some hints and nudges in the right direction would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hey krash91! welcome to pf! :wink:

for both questions, use the work energy theorem …

what do you get? :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top