Help on an acceleration problem (Deceleration?)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a speed skater who slows down while crossing a rough ice patch. The initial speed is 8.7 m/s, and the final speed after crossing the 5.6 m patch is 6.0 m/s. The time taken to cross the patch cannot be calculated using constant velocity formulas, as the skater experiences uniform acceleration. Participants suggest using kinematics equations for uniform acceleration to find the correct solution. Understanding these equations is essential for solving similar physics problems effectively.
dranly1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A speed skater moving across frictionless ice at 8.7 m/s hits a 5.6 m -wide patch of rough ice. She slows steadily, then continues on at 6.0 m/s.

What is her acceleration on the rough ice?

Homework Equations



(v1-v0)/t

The Attempt at a Solution



So I've attempted to determine the amount of time it takes her to get across the ice by dividing 5.6 m/s to 8.7 m/s getting .64 m/s to cross the rough patch. So the equation I tried was this: (6.0-8.7)/.64 = -7.59 which isn't correct. I'm in need of some help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But the 8.7 m/s is the speed she moved before she hit the 5.6m patch. So the time taken to cross the patch is not 5.6/8.7.
 
My thought was that since she was moving 8.7 m/s that it would take her less than a second to move across a distance less than 8.7 meters.
 
dranly1 said:
My thought was that since she was moving 8.7 m/s that it would take her less than a second to move across a distance less than 8.7 meters.
That's not necessarily true. It depends on how fast she slows down.

And like klondike mentioned, the t = x/v formula is only valid if she is traveling with a constant velocity. But that's not the case when she is on the rough patch of ice.

When she's on the rough patch of ice, she is traveling with uniform acceleration.

There is another kinematics equation/formula that you can use to solve this directly (or combine two of the other ones solve it that way, but that makes the problem more complicated).

There are some kinematics equations for uniform acceleration found here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110015

Physics is a pretty neat area of study, because there are relatively few things that require memorization. That said, this set of kinematics equations for uniform acceleration are one of the exceptions that I strongly recommend that you memorize. You don't have to memorize much in physics, but do memorize these. :wink: (There are 4 kinematics equations for uniform acceleration that should be memorized. Not all of the equations in the link I provided relate to uniform acceleration kinematics.)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top