How Does Dielectric Susceptibility Affect Charge Force Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teastu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force on a charge near a dielectric block, specifically addressing the role of dielectric susceptibility in this process. Participants suggest using Gauss' law to determine the electric field created by the charge and the induced field from the dielectric's susceptibility. There are clarifications regarding the units of the induced field and the relationship between electric displacement and charge density. Participants also explore the application of Gauss' law to find induced charge per unit area and the subsequent calculation of force using Coulomb's law. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise equations and understanding of the underlying physics principles.
teastu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help with this-a charge 10 microcoul. is at 10 cm from a large dielectric block of susceptibility 10, find force on charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teastu said:
Can anyone help with this-a charge 10 microcoul. is at 10 cm from a large dielectric block of susceptibility 10, find force on charge.
I think this is how to approach it:

1. Use Gauss' law to find the field of q at 10 cm without the dielectric present (this is the applied field E_a that induces an opposing field in the dielectric by polarizing the polar molecules in the dielectric).

2. Determine the magnitude of the induced field of the dielectric from the susceptibility \chi_e using:

P = \epsilon_0\chi_eE_a = \frac{E_i - E_a}{4\pi}

3. Apply Gauss' law to the dielectric surface to find the induced charge from the polarized dielectric.

4. Determine the force is using Coulomb's law.

AM
 
Thanks, but I can't still do it. 1, Won't the field due to the charge be different at different points of the large dielectric?
2, Can you give the equation quoted in SI units?
3, Please tell me how to apply Gauss's law here.
Can this be done with the method of images?
 
teastu said:
Thanks, but I can't still do it. 1, Won't the field due to the charge be different at different points of the large dielectric?
2, Can you give the equation quoted in SI units?
3, Please tell me how to apply Gauss's law here.
Can this be done with the method of images?
1. Gauss' law:

\oint E\cdot dA = 4\pi r^2E = q/\epsilon_0

so that gives you E from the charge q.

2. In MKS the induced field is:

E_i = \epsilon_0E(1 + \chi_0) where E is from 1

so you can work out the induced field from that.

3. Apply Gauss' law to the dielectric surface to find the induced charge per unit area:

\oint E_i\cdot dA = E_i A = q_i/\epsilon_0 = \sigma_iA/\epsilon_0

So from 1 2, and 3.: E_i = \sigma_i/\epsilon_0 = \frac{q}{4\pi r^2}(1 + \chi_0)

So that gives you the induced charge density in the dielectric.

4. Determine the force (per unit area of dielectric) using Coulomb's law.

AM
 
Hi,

I am working on a similar problem, and there is something I don't understand in the approach above: the induced field (which is actually the displacement, right?) does not have the same units as the applied field - actually Ei has units C/m2! so that you can't get a charge density...

Can anyone help?

-Nakis
 
Nakis said:
Hi,

I am working on a similar problem, and there is something I don't understand in the approach above: the induced field (which is actually the displacement, right?) does not have the same units as the applied field - actually Ei has units C/m2! so that you can't get a charge density...

Can anyone help?

-Nakis
I see that there is an error in my earlier post. It should be:

2. In MKS the induced field is:

E_i = E(1 + \chi_0) where E is from 1

[note: this can also be viewed in terms of the field from a displacement charge density, D:

\vec D = \epsilon_0\vec{E}(1 + \chi_0) = \epsilon_0\vec{E}_i]


3. Apply Gauss' law to the dielectric surface to find the induced charge per unit area:

\oint E_i\cdot dA = E_i A = q_i/\epsilon_0 = \sigma_iA/\epsilon_0

So from 1, 2 and 3.: E_i = \sigma_i/\epsilon_0 = \frac{q}{\epsilon_04\pi r^2}(1 + \chi_0)

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_displacement_field

AM
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top