Help understanding a SR equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reikoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sr
Reikoku
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm currently a stage 1 Physics student at uni; and in the process of learning Special Relativity.

I was reading my textbook and came across this in the Time and Space section:

Suppose an observer in frame S measures two flashbulbs going off at the same time t but at different x-coordinates x1 and x2. Then an observer in frame S` would measure the time interval t`1 - t`2 between the flashbulbs going to be:

t`1 - t`2 = \gamma((x2-x1)*(u/c)^2)

I was wondering why it's t`1 - t`2 instead of the usual t`2 - t`1. I assume it's to prevent the final answer being negative? I feel like I'm being stupid asking this :|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just to get rid of a minus sign. The full transformation is:
\Delta t' = \gamma(\Delta t - v\Delta x/c^2)

Since Δt = 0, you get:
\Delta t' = -\gamma(v\Delta x/c^2)

Where Δt' is the usual t'2 - t'1. But if you switch the order you can get rid of the minus sign on the right hand side.
 
Yeah that makes sense now, cheers! :D
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top