Help What's wrong with this picture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter solutionhereplz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problematic DMV publication related to stopping distances and acceleration calculations. Participants suggest verifying the accuracy of stopping distances based on initial velocity and examining thinking distances. There is an emphasis on demonstrating effort and showing calculations to receive constructive feedback. Concerns are raised about the differences in average acceleration for braking distances. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity and verification in understanding driving safety metrics.
solutionhereplz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Help! What's wrong with the dmv publication?:cry:
http://www.theusefulblog.com/47331.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?:frown:
 
Well, there's a few things you can do =). Test to see if the stopping distances are correct given the initial velocity. Look into the thinking distances and other various things.
 
Last edited:
solutionhereplease said:
Anyone?:frown:
We can't really help you until you first show us your effort. Please read the posting Guidelines again.
 
I know their average acceleration for the braking distance are diff, but could that be the case? I'm not sure if I have to worry about the thinking distance either.
 
Last edited:
solutionhereplease said:
I know their average acceleration for the braking distance are diff, but could that be the case? I'm not sure if I have to worry about the thinking distance either.

Just glancing at the progression of distances, I'd say you were right. Show your work for how you calculated the accelerations.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

An optics question concerning pictures taken by camera
Replies
27
Views
1K
How to picture a radial field around a 3d object?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Does someone understand this picture? (Solar heating)
Replies
6
Views
1K
Solving for Simple Harmonic Motion: A Picture Problem
Replies
1
Views
2K
Picture Posting Help - Tips & Tricks
Replies
11
Views
1K
What's the pressure long before the fluid exits a pipe?
Replies
13
Views
1K
Static equilibrium -- A picture hanging on a wall
Replies
9
Views
3K
Calculating Average Acceleration of a Particle Moving in a Circle
Replies
15
Views
2K
Mass of a picture in static equilibrium
Replies
8
Views
2K
Block tied to a fixed string on an accelerating wedge
Replies
37
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top