Help with 2 pulleys 2 objects.

  • Thread starter Thread starter revolve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two pulleys and two masses connected by strings. Participants are trying to establish the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses, m1 and m2, and clarify the tensions in the strings. There is confusion regarding the setup of equations and the movement of the masses in relation to each other. It is suggested that m1 moves half the distance of m2 due to the pulley configuration, which is a critical point for solving the problem. Visualizing the system and drawing a diagram is recommended to better understand the mechanics involved.
revolve
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass on a frictionless horizontal table is connected to an object of mass m2 through a very light pulley P1 and a light fixed pulley P2. (a) If a1 and a2 are the accelerations of m1 and m2, respectively, what is the relation between these accelerations? Express (b) the tensions in the strings and (c) the accelerations a1 and a2 in terms of the masses m1 and m2, and g.


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to setup the equations correctly. I know I need 2 equations for each object. Right?

Assuming positive direction is down:

\sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}

\sum Fx = T = ma_{1}
 

Attachments

  • 2pulley2obj.jpg
    2pulley2obj.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 359
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two ropes in the system. In which rope is the tension T?
 
Okay the diagram was confusing. I thought it was all one rope.

Tension T would be related to P2.

Not sure how I would proceed next.
 
<br /> \sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}<br />

<br /> \sum Fx = T_{1}+T_{2} = ma_{1}<br />

T2 being the tension in P1?
 
revolve said:
<br /> \sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}<br />

<br /> \sum Fx = T_{1}+T_{2} = ma_{1}<br />

T2 being the tension in P1?
Your equation in the x direction is incorrect. But before you go too far, you should first find the relationship between a1 and a2. If m2 drops down 1 meter, how far does m1 move in that same time period?
 
I'm not sure how to determine how far m1 moves relative to m2.
 
revolve said:
I'm not sure how to determine how far m1 moves relative to m2.
Try drawing a little sketch and note that the lengths of the ropes (the one on the right side of P1, and the continuous 'doubled up' rope on the left of P1), do not change in total length as the masses move. Start by assuming the length of the right rope is 2 m long (1 m to P1 to P2 and 1 meter P2 to m2), and assume that the length of the rope left of P1 is 2 m long (1 m from P1 to the wall, and 1 m from P1 to m1). Then use your visual imagination to see what happens if m2 were to nmov down 1 m from ints original position. It does take a close examination to determine this, it seems diffcult at first, but it's not too difficult once you see what's happening.
 
Last edited:
m1 moves half the distance of m2?

or the other way around. Confusing!

Okay P1 is half of P2 so m1 moves half the distance of m2. I think.
 
Last edited:
revolve said:
m1 moves half the distance of m2?

or the other way around. Confusing!

Okay P1 is half of P2 so m1 moves half the distance of m2. I think.
Indeed it is, revolve, it is indeed confusing. Look at it this way: Let the distance, initially, between P1 and P2 be 1 m, and let the distance between P2 and m2 be one meter, initially. Now if m2 were to move down by a meter, that would make P1 crash right into P2, correct? Such that now all the 2 m of rope we assumed, wrapped around P1 to the wall and m1, is now all on the top side of P1, 2 m from the wall. So where does that put m1??
 
Back
Top