Help with a Physics Capacitor Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter imationrouter03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Physics
AI Thread Summary
A user is struggling with a physics problem involving a parallel-plate capacitor, specifically calculating the maximum charge on the plates without exceeding a specified electric field. They initially attempted to use formulas for charge but found that their answers depended on variables that should not be included. Another participant clarified that the maximum electric field (E) relates to the potential difference (V) and the plate separation (x), suggesting that V should be interpreted as the electric field rather than electric potential. They also explained that inserting a dielectric increases capacitance by a factor of K, which in turn affects the maximum charge if the voltage remains constant. The discussion highlights confusion over variable dependencies and the correct interpretation of the problem's parameters.
imationrouter03
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in a physicsw/calII class and I'm stuck on this problem, hope u can help me out.

A parallel-plate capacitor has a capacitance of C_0 when there is air between the plates. The separation between the plates is x.

a)What is the maximum magnitude of charge that can be placed on each plate if the electric field in the region between the plates is not to exceed V?

For this question a, I've tried q=(V*epsilon*A)/x but the answer did not depend on the variables: A, and epsilon_0
I've also tried q=C_0*V but the answer involved the variable x. =(

b) A dielectric with a dielectric constant of K is inserted between the plates of the capacitor, completely filling the volume between the plates. Now what is the maximum magnitude of charge on each plate if the electric field between the plates is not to exceed V?

For this question i think the dielectric wouldn't change the charge value but it would affect the capacitor by a factor of K. I don't know where to go from here.. b.c "not to exceed V" i don't understand that statement.

thank you for your time and concern.. any feedback would be appreciated :o)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage is the ratio of the charge and the capacitance. V = Q / C. Therefore, maximum charge should be independent of the distance between the plates.

When you add the dielectric to a capactior, you increase the capacitace by K times. The new capacitance would be K * C. If the voltage across has to be kept constant, and the capacitance increases, then the charge also has to increase by that value i.e. K. Therefore, you new charge value would be K times your old charge value.

- harsh
 
imationrouter03 said:
a)What is the maximum magnitude of charge that can be placed on each plate if the electric field in the region between the plates is not to exceed V?

For this question a, I've tried q=(V*epsilon*A)/x but the answer did not depend on the variables: A, and epsilon_0
I've also tried q=C_0*V but the answer involved the variable x. =(

Careful, if V in this problem corresponds to electric field (as opposed to electric potential), then this V does not mean the same thing as the V in the formula "q=CV". I think it's an incredibly bad idea to use V for the E field, so I won't. I'll use E.

So, if the max E field is E, then the max potential difference is V=Ex.

That should help with both parts. Give it a shot, and come back if you need to.
 
well I've tried : k*E*x*C but that didn't seem to work.. it said that the answer doesn't involve the variable k nor C

i don't know what to do.. i don't even think i understand the problem

feedback please
 
The field E between the plates is \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \sigma in SI units, that should give you a hint
 
i used E=sigma/epsilon_0 and equated V=Ex with V=(sigma*x)/epsilon_0 and got the following solving for the charge

q=(V*A*epsilon)/(x)

which just happened to be my first wrong response...

The correct answer shouldn't involve variables: A, epsilon_0, k nor C.. what am i doing wrong?

feedback please
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top