Help with a Problem: Find H in Terms of R

  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To determine the height h in terms of R for a ball rolling without slipping to reach point Q at the top of a loop, the conservation of energy principle is applied. At point Q, the energy is purely potential (mgh), while at point H, it combines potential and kinetic energy (mgh + 1/2mv^2). The velocity at point H can be expressed as v = ωR, leading to the equation mgh = mgh + 1/2m(ωR)^2. By substituting R as 2πr and expressing ω in terms of the time T for one revolution, the final formula for h is derived as h = (4π^2r/T^2)/g. This equation provides the necessary height for the ball to successfully complete the loop.
mprm86
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I have attached an image of the problem. Which should be the height h (expressed in terms of R) if the ball needs to reach the point Q. The ball will roll without slipping.
In the image, Q is the highest point in the loop. R is the ratio of the loop (think of it as a circle). H is a point on the straight secton of the track, and it is measured respect to the ground.
 

Attachments

  • Dibujo.GIF
    Dibujo.GIF
    3.7 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give you a push but you have to do the work yourself.

Consider the minimum kinetic energy the ball must have to just complete this circular loop without falling. This would be the kinetic energy that corresponds to the tangential speed where the normal force from the track just equals zero.

Does this ring any bells?
 


To find the height h in terms of R, we can use the conservation of energy principle. Since the ball is rolling without slipping, the total energy at the highest point Q will be equal to the total energy at point H.

At point Q, the total energy is only potential energy given by mgh, where m is the mass of the ball and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

At point H, the total energy is a combination of potential and kinetic energy. The potential energy is still mgh, but the kinetic energy is given by 1/2mv^2, where v is the velocity of the ball at point H.

Since the ball is rolling without slipping, the velocity at point H can be expressed as v = ωR, where ω is the angular velocity of the ball and R is the radius of the loop.

Now, equating the total energy at points Q and H, we get mgh = mgh + 1/2m(ωR)^2. Simplifying this equation, we get h = R(ω^2/2g).

Since R is the ratio of the loop, we can express it as R = 2πr, where r is the radius of the loop.

Substituting this into our equation for h, we get h = 2πr(ω^2/2g).

Now, we can express ω in terms of the time it takes for the ball to complete one revolution, T, and the radius of the loop, r. We know that ω = 2π/T, so substituting this into our equation for h, we get h = 2πr(2π/T)^2/2g.

Simplifying further, we get h = (4π^2r/T^2)/g.

Therefore, the height h in terms of R is given by the equation h = (4π^2r/T^2)/g, where R = 2πr and T is the time for one revolution.

I hope this helps you solve the problem and find the height h needed for the ball to reach point Q. Remember to always check your units and don't forget to include the acceleration due to gravity, g, in your calculations. Good luck!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K