Help with Hartle: Calculating Elapsed Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeLLe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hartle
HeLLe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Help with Hartle!

Hello,
I find Hartle's working very confusing. I was wondering if someone could help me decode this problem:

Three observers are standing near each other on the surface
of the Earth. Each holds an accurate atomic clock. At time t = 0 the first observer
throws their clock straight up so that it returns at time T as measured by the clock
of the second observer, who holds their clock in their hand for the entire time interval.
The third observer carries their clock up to the maximum height reached by the thrown
clock, and back down, moving with constant speed on each leg of the trip and returning
in time T.
Calculate the total elapsed time measured on each clock assuming that the maximum
height is much smaller than the radius of the Earth. Include gravitational effects but
calculate to order 1/c2 only using non-relativistic trajectories. Which clock registers
the longest proper time? Why is this?

I am assuming the clocks higher in the gp tick faster, but how the heck do we calculate the total elapsed time, and what's up with observer #3 ??

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Will I get any replies?
 
You are being asked to calculate proper time along three different paths to some approximation. Write each path in terms of, say, local coordinate time. Now what's the definition of proper time along a path with a given metric tensor?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top