Help with Reducing an Equation into Jacobi Identity Form

kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


Reduce the equation \partial_\mu {*} F^{\mu \nu} = 0 into the following form of the Jacobi Identity:

\partial_\lambda F_{\mu \nu} + \partial_\mu F_{\lambda \nu} + \partial_\nu F_{\lambda \mu} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't figure out what the '*' is supposed to be. My first thought was that it was a typo and is meant to signify a dot product, but the partial derivative is not a vector, so I don't see how this could be the case.

At any rate, this problem seems straightforward but I could use some help getting started.

Thanks for your thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kreil! :smile:

(have a curly d: ∂ and a mu and an nu: µν :wink:)

the clue is in the alteration of the position of the indices …

this is ∂µ(*Fµν) :wink:

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hodge_dual" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Tim, I figured it was an operator of some sort but my notes/book were not immediately helpful in figuring out what it was.

In a previous problem we used the following form for F,

F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu

I'm having trouble seeing how the dual operator works on this form of F. Assuming a more general form, is the following true?

*F^{\mu \nu} = \left ( F^\mu e_\mu + F^\nu e_\nu + F^\lambda e_\lambda \right ) e_\mu e_\nu e_\lambda = F_{\nu \lambda} + F_{\mu \lambda} + F_{\mu \nu}
 
Last edited:
hi kreil! :smile:

i've never really grasped the index way of doing it :redface:

i always think of it this way …

i see Fµν as a wedge product Exx∧t + Eyy∧t + Ezz∧t + Bxy∧z + Byz∧x + Bzx∧y

then for "curl" i wedge-multiply by ∂∧ = ∂xx∧ + ∂yy∧ + ∂zz∧ + ∂tt∧,

and use the equivalence x∧y∧z → *t, y∧z∧t → *x, z∧x∧t → *y, x∧y∧t → *z

(the jacobi identity is written in triple-wedges x∧y∧z etc)

i seem to remember there's a fairly good description of this in (surprisingly) Misner Thorne and Wheeler "Gravitation"
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top