Help with textbook question -- Where did the factor of 2 come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Julia Coggins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a textbook problem from "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" regarding the calculation of magnetic field strength around a nichrome wire. The confusion arises from the use of μ/2π instead of μ/4π in the Biot-Savart Law, which is clarified by referencing a preceding example in the text. Participants discuss the evaluation of an integral related to the problem, noting that the integral provided in the text requires limits and the application of l'Hôpital's rule for proper evaluation. There is a consensus that understanding the integral's evaluation is crucial for grasping the magnetic field calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reviewing calculus concepts to resolve such issues effectively.
Julia Coggins
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
moved into h/w help, so template is missing
From "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Randall D. Knight page 1006. A 1 m long, 1.0 mm diameter nichrome heater wire is connected to a 12 V battery. Find the magnetic field strength 1 cm away from the wire. This problem is solved in the book, but they calculate the magnetic field with: μ/2π instead of μ/4π that is in the Biot-Savart Law. Everything else in my calculations was correct, so I'm wondering why they used this? The full equation they used is: B=μ/2π(I/d) related from the Biot Savart Law for a current carrying wire B ={μ/4π}{IΔs×r/r^2} the 'r' in the numerator is the direction of r not the magnitude.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you see the preceding example (continued onto the top of page 1006)
where they used Biot-Savart to obtain the equation for B_wire?
 
Reading it now. I don't understand how they evaluated that integral?
 
Julia Coggins said:
I don't understand how they evaluated that integral?
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral(1/sqrt(x^2+d^2)^3,x) (Trig substitution... see step-by-step)
The text gave you the integral to do, then they did the integral (with limits).
Plug in the limits and use l'Hopital's rule... you get "1 - (-1)" = 2
 
Unfortunately I don't have wolfram alpha pro, I do need to brush up on my calc though. Isn't L'hopitals rules dealing with indefinite integrals like this one?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top