Help with this 9th grade motion problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter johsun123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
Two stones are thrown vertically upwards with initial velocities U1 and U2, and the task is to prove that the heights reached are in the ratio U1 squared to U2 squared. The initial attempt incorrectly suggests that the ratio of heights should be U1 to U2, as acceleration and time would cancel out. However, the correct approach involves using the kinematic equation for height, which relates initial velocity to the maximum height reached under constant acceleration. The discussion highlights the need for a proper formula for distance or height and clarifies that the conservation of energy principle has not yet been covered in their studies. Understanding the correct relationship between initial velocity and height is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
johsun123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Help with this 9th grade "motion" problem

Homework Statement



2 stones are thrown vertically upwards with initial velocities U1 & U2. Prove that heights recahed by them is in ration U1squared:U2squared.

Homework Equations



S=u+at u being initial velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



since a and t will cancel out, ration should be u1: u2 not the squared. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Use the conservation of energy to find the relationship between the 2 heights.
 


Care to explain it a bit more? Which is the equation you are referring to?

We are yet to learn law of conservation of energy.
 


If you throw a stone up with velocity U1, how high does it get?
 


johsun123 said:

Homework Statement



2 stones are thrown vertically upwards with initial velocities U1 & U2. Prove that heights recahed by them is in ration U1squared:U2squared.

Homework Equations



S=u+at u being initial velocity
This is incorrect. u+ at is the formula for the speed at t seconds given initial velocity u and acceleration t. Do you have a formula for distance or height of an object moving with constant acceleration?

The Attempt at a Solution



since a and t will cancel out, ration should be u1: u2 not the squared. What am I missing?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top