Hi there. Just looking at an astophysics journal article in which they

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the temperature of a pulsar stated as T=300 eV in an astrophysics journal article. The query seeks clarification on whether this notation implies T=300 eV/k, where k is the Boltzmann constant, leading to a temperature of approximately 3.75 million Kelvin. Participants consider the accuracy of this conversion and the potential for discrepancies, such as a factor of 2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of energy units in astrophysical measurements. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for precise interpretation of temperature in astrophysics.
SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Hi there. Just looking at an astophysics journal article in which they say the temperature of a pulsar is T=300eV..

My query is the following:

is T=300eV shorthand for say T=300ev/k (k=Boltzman constant) so the corresponding temperature in Kelvin is T=3.75X10^6K?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Right. There might be a factor of 2 somewhere, but I would not expect this.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top