Hi there. Just looking at an astophysics journal article in which they

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the temperature of a pulsar stated as T=300 eV in an astrophysics journal article. The query seeks clarification on whether this notation implies T=300 eV/k, where k is the Boltzmann constant, leading to a temperature of approximately 3.75 million Kelvin. Participants consider the accuracy of this conversion and the potential for discrepancies, such as a factor of 2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of energy units in astrophysical measurements. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for precise interpretation of temperature in astrophysics.
SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Hi there. Just looking at an astophysics journal article in which they say the temperature of a pulsar is T=300eV..

My query is the following:

is T=300eV shorthand for say T=300ev/k (k=Boltzman constant) so the corresponding temperature in Kelvin is T=3.75X10^6K?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Right. There might be a factor of 2 somewhere, but I would not expect this.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
921
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
930