High Voltage A-synchronous Buck Converter (100V -> 28V)

AI Thread Summary
The user is designing a 100V-28V DC-DC Buck converter and successfully tested it on a breadboard, but it fails to work on a stripboard. They constructed two linear series regulators to supply 12V to the ICs during startup and after achieving 28V output, but the circuit does not function as expected on the stripboard. Troubleshooting revealed no short circuits, but the base voltage of the NPN transistor does not reach the expected 12V, dropping to zero after 3.2V instead. This issue likely prevents the ICs from receiving the necessary voltage to operate. The user seeks assistance in diagnosing the problem with the stripboard setup.
gdylp2004
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm new in here and hope I could get some advices.

I am designing a 100V-28V DC-DC Buck converter (as per tittle) and has successfully tested on breadboard.

The problem is when I've transferred everything to the stripboard, the circuit does not work. This is confusing to me because isn't connection made on the stripboard should perform better since parasitic components are lesser?

From my schematic attached, you can see that the 12V Vcc for the 2 IC chips (IR2117 & TC4420EPA) are powered by 2 different auxillary supplies at different times. What I've done is basically construct 2 linear series reg. (one from the 100V V+ and other from the 28V Vout) as could be seen. My idea is, during start-up, Vcc is supplied via the 100V series linear reg for a very short time and once Vout achieved 28V, the supply of Vcc is then transferred and will be drawn from the 28V Vout instead. This should be easily understood by most experts here.

Weird thing is everything worked out perfectly on breadboard but not on stripboard. WHY?

Upon troubleshooting, I've found no zero short circuit between paths, all zener diodes and NPN transistors are also working fine. BUt when I do an o-scope on the base of the NPN transistor (100V linear series reg.), I've realized that the base voltage (or the zener voltage) did not have the chance to climb till 12V. In theory, as long as V+ > 12V, the 12V zener will hold at this voltage even if we ramp more than 12V to V+.

In the o-scope graph attached, (V+ = 30V), it should already have a high enough voltage to ramp Vb > 12V? But the waveform on oscope doesn't seems to be the case (see VB_30.jpg attachment).

The waveform tells me that Vb attempts to rise but dropped to zero immediately after ~3.2V like that.

WHY? This could be the very reason why my circuit can't work because the IC doesn't have a 12V Vdd to start with.

Attached are my schematic, stripboard layout and the o-scope readings.

Could anyone help? Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • full_sch.jpg
    full_sch.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 991
  • sch_grid.jpg
    sch_grid.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 655
  • VB_30.jpg
    VB_30.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 617
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some additional photos of the real thing.
 

Attachments

  • full_front.jpg
    full_front.jpg
    59.8 KB · Views: 539
  • full_back.jpg
    full_back.jpg
    70.1 KB · Views: 573
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top