Higher temperature gradient result in heat traveling further/faster?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a heat transfer simulation where the user expected that a higher temperature gradient would result in heat traveling further and faster. However, the simulation results showed that heat reached the same distance at a specific time for both higher (350 K) and lower (271 K) temperatures, leading to confusion. Participants suggested adjusting the temperature scales in the simulation for better clarity, indicating that the perceived results were misleading due to inconsistent color shadings. It was clarified that with uniform scales, the heat distribution would appear more intuitive, demonstrating that heat does not necessarily travel further with increased temperature gradients but may do so in larger quantities. Overall, the user was encouraged to re-evaluate the simulation with consistent temperature scales for accurate interpretation.
examorph
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been playing around with a simulation software package and ran a heat transfer simulation however, to me the results did not seem intuitive. From my understanding the distance heat travels in a specific amount of time is proportional to the temperature difference, for example, if the temperature difference is large then heat will travel faster than if a smaller temperature difference. I had ran this simulation at two different temperatures:

350 K: https://imageshack.com/i/gh2ybgp
271 K: https://imageshack.com/i/euj54bp

Both with an initial temperature of 270 K. I would have thought that the 350 k simulation would have a different profile in which the temperature would have traveled further. Is this simulation incorrect or am I just looking at these results wrong?

Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The temperature scales are different in the two pictures. If you can persuade your software to use the same color shadings for the same temperatures (you may have to use red for anything greater than, for example, 275) you'll get results that match your intuition better.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you for answering my question, I thought about this and it raised another related question.

If I look at it now with the temperature scales currently set the heat is shown traveling the same distance at that point in time on both wall temperatures (it reaches the 270 K (blue) temperature at the same time), does this mean that the heat does not travel further when the temperature gradient is increased but instead travels the same distance in larger "quantities"?
 
Could anyone please let me know if this is correct or am I looking at it wrong?
 
That isn't what these images say. Change the scale so that red is at 271 for both images and then look. You will see that nearly the entire figure is red. You are just confusing yourself because you have the scales set differently.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top