Solving Hockey Puck Problem Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter chiurox
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics homework problem related to a hockey puck's motion on a surface with varying coefficients of friction. For part a, the calculated coefficient of friction is 0.16, and for part b, the initial velocity needed to travel 6.0m with that friction is found to be 4.4m/s. The user struggles with part c, which involves determining the coefficient of friction for a section of the surface after the puck travels 4.0m at 0.16 friction, and seeks help. The advice given suggests using work and energy principles to simplify the calculations for parts c and d, with a proposed coefficient of friction uk2 calculated as 0.25. The user concludes that the initial velocity for part d should be around 5.5m/s to stop after 6.0m, indicating a need for verification of their approach.
chiurox
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hockey puck with a mass of 0.50 kg is hit in a straight line along a horizontal playing surface.
Well, there are 4 parts to this question:
a. If the puck has an initial velocity of 4.0m/s and stops after 5.0, what is the coefficient of friction, uk1, of the playing surface?
My answer: for this one, I got 0.16 and I'm quite sure it's right, unless someone can prove me wrong.

b. What should the initial velocity be if the coefficient of friction is 0.16 and the puck has to travel 6.0m?
My answer: I got 4.4m/s and again I think it's right, unless someone can prove me wrong.

c. Someone spills food on the playing surface, changing the coefficient of friction over a 1.0 m section. Now, in order for the puck to travel 6.0 m, it first goes 4.0 m over a surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.16, then it goes 1.0m over a surface with a coefficient of friction uk2, and finally it goes 1.0 m over a surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.16 again. If the initial velocity of the puck in a straight line must now be 5.0 m/s in order to travel 5.0m, what is the coefficient of friction, uk2?
My answer: I'm stuck on this one... help please?
d. What must the initial velocity of the puck in (c) be in order for the puck to stop after 6.0m?
Well, since I'm having problems with (c), I don't know about this one.


Could anyone help me please as soon as possible?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Parts a and b look right to me.

have you studied work/energy yet? the next parts can be done with work/energy... it is much easier than the kinematic way described below.

For part c).

you have 2 parts:

v0=5m/s<----4.0m---->v1<----1.0m---->v =0

so over 5.0 m... the first 4.0m is a surface of coeff. 0.16. the next 1.0m is uk2.

find the velocity v1 just as it gets on the part of the surface with uk2 (you can get this using the initial velocity v0, distance=4.0m and accleration, which you can get from the coefficient of friction 0.16).

now you can get the acceleration over the uk2 surface using d = 1.0m final velocity v= 0... and v1 which you just calculated above... from that you can find frictional force and uk2.

for part d). work backwards...
you have 3 parts

v0 <---- 4.0m ----> v1 <---1.0m----> v2 <---1.0m---> v = 0

get v2... then v1... then v0...
 
I'm not sure if I got what you told me, but I worked out the problem in a similar way:
Vo^2 / 2(uk2)(g) = 5.0 which is the distance traveled,so I got the coefficient of uk2 = 0.25
Well, since the puck has to go over a total distance of 5 meters with a velocity of 5.0m/s, and we know from part (a) that with an initial velocity of 4.0m/s the puck stopped after 5.0m. So uk2 has to be significantly bigger than uk1 since the puck is traveling the same distance (5m) but with a velocity of 5.0m/s.

(d). I used 0.25=uk2 to plug in the equation Vo^2 / 2uk2(g) = distance traveled or 6
then I found Vo = 5.5m/s so that the puck will stop after 6.0m
I don't know if it's right, but I feel that it at least makes sense because the puck has to travel 1 more meter and therefore the initial velocity has to be a bit bigger.

Could anyone help me check or point out some mistakes I did?
I'm taking AP Physics B by self-studying, with no textbook, and doing activities online (such as this one) worth grade. So I'm pretty much lost almost all of the time heh...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top