How are the x1 and x4 values determined in the solution to the matrix equation?

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
Hi, rapid fire posting in this subforum I know, sorry if that's annoying. Let me know if I should space my posts out a bit more.

Here's an image of the solution to a worked example (from Intro to Linear Algebra 4th by Strang)

IG6r15H.jpg


here's the imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/IG6r15H.jpg

I cannot figure out what the underlined (underlining added by me) sentences mean:

"The first and last rows give x2 and x3. Then the middle rows give x1 and x4."

How do the middle rows only give x1 and x4? Is this the result of treating this as a system of simultaneous equations rather than linear combinations? That's the only explanation I can find at the moment. Mostly I don't know what the author's intended meaning is.

I could find all the x's by solving simultaneous equations, but would that be how the author has done it, or has Strang found the x's a different way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What the author describes IS the solving of the 'simultaneous' equations :
##x_2 = b_1 \\
x_3-x_1 = b_2\\
x_4 - x_2 = b_3\\
-x_3 = b_4 ##​

we humans don't do 'simultaneously: we see that this means that

first and last rows give x2 and x3 and THEN the middle rows give x1 and x4.​

Thereby Cx = b has been solved, and that can only be the case if C is invertible (x = C-1 b).
 
  • Like
Likes kostoglotov
Solving the system of simultaneous equations just means that the same solution should be valid for all equations.
 
  • Like
Likes kostoglotov
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top