How Can a Cricketer's Bowling Technique Influence Projectile Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NASSAfellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Projectiles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a cricketer's bowling technique and the projectile motion of a cricket ball. The initial analysis shows that the ball takes approximately 0.7 seconds to fall 2.3 meters from a height of 2.3 meters, using standard kinematic equations. Participants seek assistance with subsequent parts of the problem, specifically how long it takes the ball to rise 0.71 meters after bouncing and how to calculate the initial horizontal velocity. A contributor mentions the coefficient of restitution, suggesting that all velocities, including horizontal, are affected by the same reduction ratio. The conversation highlights the complexities of projectile motion and the impact of air resistance on horizontal velocity.
NASSAfellow
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was practicing exams for PHY 1 but I don't understand how to do this question, even with the mark scheme.

A cricketer bowls a ball from a height of 2.3m. The ball leaves the hand horizontally with a velocity u. After bouncing once, it passes just over the stumps at the top of its bounce. The stumps are 0.71m high and are situated 20m from where the bowler releases the ball.

(Diagram shown)

a) Show that from the momnt it is released, the ball takes about 0.7 s to fall 2.3 m.

This is pretty easy, resolving vertically,
u = 0 m/s
a= -9.81 m/s/s
s= 2.3 m

Using v^2= u^2 + 2as
u^2 cancels out.
2 x -9.81 x 2.3 = 45.126
Square root ans = v = -6.72 m/s
Using t = v-u/a
-6.72-0/-9.81 = 0.685s

Then it says, b) How long does it take the ball to rise 0.71 m after bouncing? (3 mark question)


Then c) Use your answers to parts (a) and (b) to calculate the initial horizontal velocity u of the ball. You may assume that the horizonatl velocity has remained constant (2 marks)



d) In reality the horixontal velocity would not be constant. State one reason why.

The answer to this is simple too: There will be significant air resistance at the bounce.

Please could someone help with parts b and c.

Thanks, Nasser
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NASSAfellow said:

Homework Statement



I was practicing exams for PHY 1 but I don't understand how to do this question, even with the mark scheme.

A cricketer bowls a ball from a height of 2.3m. The ball leaves the hand horizontally with a velocity u. After bouncing once, it passes just over the stumps at the top of its bounce. The stumps are 0.71m high and are situated 20m from where the bowler releases the ball.

(Diagram shown)

a) Show that from the momnt it is released, the ball takes about 0.7 s to fall 2.3 m.

This is pretty easy, resolving vertically,
u = 0 m/s
a= -9.81 m/s/s
s= 2.3 m

Using v^2= u^2 + 2as
u^2 cancels out.
2 x -9.81 x 2.3 = 45.126
Square root ans = v = -6.72 m/s
Using t = v-u/a
-6.72-0/-9.81 = 0.685s

Then it says, b) How long does it take the ball to rise 0.71 m after bouncing? (3 mark question)


Then c) Use your answers to parts (a) and (b) to calculate the initial horizontal velocity u of the ball. You may assume that the horizonatl velocity has remained constant (2 marks)



d) In reality the horixontal velocity would not be constant. State one reason why.

The answer to this is simple too: There will be significant air resistance at the bounce.

Please could someone help with parts b and c.

Thanks, Nasser


um, what grade is this?:eek:
 
What a canny problem. i believe this assumes knowledge of coefficient of restitution which can be computed from the ratios of Yf/Yi, specifically the sqrt of same. All velocities are subject, including horizontal, to the same reduction, in other words Vxf=0.55Vxi.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top