How can a torque be derived for a moving dipole without external fields?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tavsaito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving torque for a moving dipole without external electric or magnetic fields. It highlights that, in the absence of these fields, there should theoretically be no torque acting on the dipole. The conversation suggests that the situation involves relativity, where the moving dipole creates its own distorted electric field, leading to a non-parallel component. A proposed setup involves two point charges on a moving dielectric, prompting calculations of electric and magnetic fields from Maxwell's equations without relativistic corrections. Ultimately, it concludes that proving torque exists in this scenario requires considering relativistic effects, referencing the Right-Angle (Lewis-Tolman) Paradox.
tavsaito
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am at a loss for how to start this problem.
t = r x F and F = q(E + v x B) i know but there is no external E or B field its just a dipole that moves with a speed v in the x direction the dipole is oriented with +q at (d,d,0) and -q @ (-d,-d,0)

how do i derive a torque?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tavsaito said:
I am at a loss for how to start this problem.
t = r x F and F = q(E + v x B) i know but there is no external E or B field its just a dipole that moves with a speed v in the x direction the dipole is oriented with +q at (d,d,0) and -q @ (-d,-d,0)

how do i derive a torque?

If there is no external E or B field, there should not be any torque. Are you sure you've stated the problem correctly?
 
yes there are no external E or B fields i think it has to do with relativity. the one particle creates a E field in its own frame which becomes distorted when it moves allowing there to be a non parallel component.
 
the problem is.

Consider two point charges +/- q embedded on a square dielectric in the x-y plane the dielectric is a perfect insulator and the charges cannot move or be neutralized. Assume that i) the origin of the coordinates is in the center of the square and the positive and negative charges are respectively at (d,d,0) and (-d,-d,0) and ii) the square dielectric is moving at velocity (V,0,0).
a) derive an expression for the torque on the system. Calculate E and B from maxwell's equations but without relativistic corrections
b) It was proposed to use a similar set up to measure the absolute velocity of a body in space. For example this could be used to detect the velocity of Earth in its rotation around the sun. Do you think such an experiment would work? If necessary in your explanations, use the relativistically correct expressions for the E and B fields cause by each charge at the others position.
 
Solution: Basically were asking to prove that it wasnt possible unless taken in a relativistic regime. See the Right-Angle (Lewis-Tolman) Paradox where you can observe a torque in the moving frame but it does not result in any actual rotation
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top