How can I calculate the compression of a support column under a heavier weight?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the compression of a support column under a heavier weight, the equation F=KX is used, where F is the force, K is the stiffness, and X is the compression. Given a weight of 5.42 x 10^5 N causing a compression of 2.46 x 10^-4 m, the stiffness K is calculated to be approximately 2.2 billion N/m. Using this K value, the compression under a new weight of 4.8 x 10^6 N is found to be 0.0022 m, confirming the calculations are correct. An alternative method using a ratio also yields the same result, demonstrating the consistency of the solution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding elastic behavior in accordance with Hooke's law.
kkmonte
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A support column is compressed 2.46 x 10^ -4m under a weight of 5.42 X 10^5N. how much is the column compressed under a weight of 4.8 X10^6N?

Homework Equations



F=KX

The Attempt at a Solution



By using that equation, I get 542000 = .000246K



Solve for K, and I get a huge number, 2,203,252,032.52



Then by using that number as my new K, and solving for the compressed distance with the new weight, I get 0.0022 m.



Is that the right answer?



Similarly, I figured I could just make a ratio proportion of:



.000246....X

------------- = ----------------

542,000....4,800,000



Which also gives me an answer of 0.0022 m (2.2 X 10^ -3). Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, either method gives you the correct solution, as long as the column is still behaving elastically in accordance with Hooke's law.
 
Thanks Jay, when I first did this problem, I was looking at the answer of 2.2e-3 and shaking my head going how can this thing compress less when there is a heavier weight on it? However it wasn't after I was typing it in the computer that I realized that the first compression is 2.46e-4, and I went, duh. =)

Thanks for letting me know I'm correct.
Ken
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top