How Can I Derive the Kepler Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Kepler
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Kepler equation, specifically the relationship between Mean Anomaly (M), Eccentric Anomaly (E), and Eccentricity (e). Participants clarify that Mean Anomaly is not an angle but a time-based measure, while both Eccentric and True Anomalies are angles measured in the orbital plane. Confusion arises from the distinction between the Ecliptic Plane and the Orbital Plane, with emphasis on the need to understand their differences in context. It is noted that finding a geometric comparison between Mean Anomaly and Eccentric Anomaly is challenging due to their differing domains—time versus physical angle. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in understanding orbital mechanics and the definitions of various anomalies.
Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
I am trying to derive the Kepler equation:

M = E - e * sin(E)

where M=Mean Anomaly, e=Eccentricity and E=Eccentric Anomaly.

If you drop a perpendicular down from the object to the Perihelion-axis you can take:

a * cos(E) = a * e + Recl * cos (TA)

where Recl is the Ecliptic radius to the object from the Sun and TA=True Anomaly.

I am having a hard time equating M and TA because one is on the Ecliptic Plane and the other is on the Orbiting Plane.

Any hints are appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mean anomaly and true anomaly are usually both measured in the plane of the orbit, so I guess I don't understand the question.
 
Try going at it using the conservation of momentum/inertia..
 
Philosophaie said:
I am having a hard time equating M and TA because one is on the Ecliptic Plane and the other is on the Orbiting Plane.
This is not the case, which is probably why you are confused. Mean anomaly is not an angle. It is merely the mean anomaly at some epoch time plus the product of time since that epoch and mean motion. There is no meaningful angle you can draw that represents mean anomaly. Kepler's equation relates mean anomaly to eccentric anomaly (which is an angle). Both eccentric anomaly and true anomaly are measured on the orbital plane rather than on the ecliptic.
 
Orbit of a planet or the orbit of a moon orbiting a planet or the orbit of a satellite orbiting the Earth?

If you're talking about a planet's orbit, the ecliptic plane of that planet (not the ecliptic plane, which normally refers to the Earth's ecliptic plane), then the ecliptic plane is the orbit plane of that planet. Using ecliptic plane in a generic question about orbits really creates a lot of confusion, probably for yourself, as well, since you seemed to believe they were referring to two separate planes. If you're talking about the Moon's orbit, then the Moon's orbital plane definitely is not the same as the ecliptic plane (and the orbital plane of a satellite will not be the ecliptic plane).

But, as DH said, it's going to be hard to find a geometric comparison between Mean Anomaly and Eccentric Anomaly. Mean Anomaly refers to the time domain. It's your location in time relative to perigee (the time you were at perigee). Eccentric Anomaly refers to the physical domain and represents an actual physical angle relative to perigee.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top