How can I derive the period of oscillation for a relaxation oscillator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter limofunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
AI Thread Summary
To derive the period of oscillation for a relaxation oscillator, the relationship involves the resistances R1, R2, the capacitance C, and the supply voltages VCC and VEE. The discussion references fundamental equations from electromagnetism, including V=IR and C=Q/V, and attempts to establish a differential equation for current I. The user deduces that the current can be expressed as I = I0Exp[-t/RC], indicating an exponential decay. The challenge lies in relating the output voltage V_out to the current using the voltage divider formula, while also addressing formatting issues with LaTeX code. Overall, the focus is on deriving the correct mathematical relationships for the oscillator's behavior.
limofunder
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having a bit of trouble with a homework problem on relaxation oscillators, the schematic is shown below:

https://webspace.utexas.edu/sz233/Relaxation%20Oscillator.png

The original problem states:
derive a relationship for the period of oscillation for a relaxation oscillator in terms of R1, R2, RC, VCC
and VEE.

Homework Equations



So I know from E&M that
V=IR, and C=Q/V.
also, I know that dq/dt = I

The Attempt at a Solution


from this, I deduce, possibly erroneously, that
V_- = IR +\frac{1}{C} \int I(t)dt
so
0 = R \frac{dI}{dt} + \frac{1}{C} * I(t)
then
\frac{dI}{I} = - \frac{1}{RC} dt
it follows that
I = I0Exp[-t/RC]

given that current doesn't change at the + or - poles on the amplifier, then this should be the same current that goes through V+ thus using the voltage divider formula,
V_out = V_+ * \frac{R_2}{R_1 + R_2}
Now, how do I relate the Vout here with the current from above?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a reason for which the latex code doesn't appear? I pulled the notation direct from the sigma reference in the tool box menu
 
thanks a bunch guys
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top