How Can I Design a Mechanism to Retract a Large Blade with Consistent Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProtoTech1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a mechanism to extend and retract a large blade, similar to a switchblade, with consistent force. The creator has a design in mind but seeks advice on ensuring the blade returns to its sheath with equal force. Suggestions include using hydraulic cylinders or mechanical linkages, emphasizing the importance of understanding design constraints. The role of energy input is highlighted, noting that all mechanisms require energy to operate, particularly to overcome friction and other resistances. Clarifying the intended functionality of the mechanism would aid in determining the necessary energy and force requirements.
ProtoTech1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So the general idea is this:
I am in the process of working out a contraption that can extend and retract a blade in and out of its sheath. It is very similar to a switchblade knive, but on a larger scale. I have come up with a design (which for patent and invention reasons I won't mention), however this proves to be quite a meticulous process.
I project the final project to have 1 to 1 1/2 foot blades protruding from their sheaths, and while I can manage on having them extend (but any ideas to better the product are appreciated), I am in need of a way to, with equal force, have the blade return to its sheath.
I do not know if I've made myself clear as to what it is that I am trying to achieve. If you have any questions concerning this, I would be more than happy to help in any way I can. That you to all who help make this possible.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What are these things attached to? Do you have electrical-pneumatic-hydraulic power available? How large are these sheaths? How fast do they need to extend/retract?

It is pretty tough to come up with ideas when you don't know the constraints that you have to work with.
 
Use a hydraulic cylinder. If you want the same force, then make sure the rod end annulus has more pressure (it will depend upon the reduction in area due to the rod).

I'm sure there are other ways but that's the first that comes to mind.

CS
 
I was thinking either hydraulic or a plain mechanical linkage. However, there is no way to know what would be acceptable until we find out what the constraints of the design are.
 
A “switchblade knife” works because there is a storage of energy in the form of a compressed spring which is released by a latching mechanism. The stored energy in the spring is then converted to kinetic energy and heat due to friction as the blade extends, then converted to heat and sound as the blade stops its motion at the end of its travel. To get the blade to retract, the blade can either be pushed closed by the user, or the button can be used to aid in compressing the spring, reversing the blade. In this case, the energy required to recompress the spring is obtained by the motion of the button. The point here is that there are no mechanisms which don’t require energy input. Such a mechanism is also called a perpetual motion machine which obviously is an impossibility.

In designing a mechanism which will extend and contract, you have to consider what amount of energy is needed to perform this task. In the case of a reciprocating piston pump for example, the amount of energy is not negligable because the energy goes into increasing a fluid’s pressure. On the other hand, the extension and retraction of something like a switchblade only requires a very small amount of energy to overcome the loss of energy due to friction and the impact as it ends the stroke.

If you can explain what your mechanism is intended to do, it would be easier to understand the amount of energy and force needed to make this blade go in and out.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top