How can I solve a dynamics problem involving a pulley, rod, and rotating masses?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a dynamics problem involving a pulley, a rod, and rotating masses. The participant has defined their coordinate system and derived equations using Newton's second law and Euler's equation, but encountered issues with incorrect answers likely due to sign conventions. Key points of confusion include the relationship between the tensions, accelerations, and the direction of rotation. It was suggested that a misplaced minus sign and the misapplication of the parallel axis theorem contributed to the errors. Ultimately, resolving the sign issues and removing unnecessary terms led to the correct solution, highlighting the importance of consistent sign conventions in dynamics problems.
jules.t
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is pulley which has a mass hanging from one side, and a rotating rod attached horizontally to the other (both by cables). The pulley has mass; Mp = 9.5kg and radius; Rp =0.2m. The block(A) has mass; Ma=10.9kg. The rod is L = 0.8m long and has mass=Ml7.9kg. The rod is also rotating at w= 2.7 rad/s in the anti clockwise direction. The value for gravity used is g= 9.8m/s/s downwards. Tensions are denoted by Ta and Tb

Homework Equations


Newtons 2nd Law(F=ma), Eulers Equation (M=I\alpha).


The Attempt at a Solution


I have defined my coordinate system as anticlockwise is positive and vertically down is positive.
Ipulley = 0.5MR2
Irod at centre of grav =(1/12)ML2
I have developed some simultaneous equations for the system:
Ta - Mag = Maaa From Newton 2nd Law of Block(A)
aa = Rp\alphap Acceleration relationship
-TaRp+TbRp=Ip\alphap Eulers equation for pulley
Tb - Mrg = Mrar Newtons second law on rod.

I also have the following(which i think is where the problem is at):
-TbL - Ir\alphar = -Lw2 Eulers equation on the rod at the centre of gravity.
ar = -L\alphar

I solved this system, and got an incorrect answer. As above i think the problem lies in the last two equations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;

OK - rod rotating anticlockwise means the pulley is rotating clockwise and the mass is moving up.
The most likely location for an error is a misplaced minus sign as you link the different fbds.

The signs in your equations don't seem to match your stated sign convention.

i.e. ##T_a-M_ag=M_aa_a## gives a negative acceleration if the weight is greater than the tension.

But you've set them up how I would except for the last one, I'd have picked anticlockwise for positive for the motion of the rod... done that way the acceleration (magnitude and sign) of the block A is also the tangential acceleration of the rim of the pulley and the acceleration of point B on the rod.

However - the problem statement lacks a goal.
What are you supposed to be finding out?
 
My apologies for not including the problems goal.
The problem asks to find the acceleration of pint B in the diagram provided.
 
I too am confused about the signs.
jules.t said:
Ta - Mag = Maaa From Newton 2nd Law of Block(A)
makes up +ve
aa = Rp\alphap Acceleration relationship
makes down and anticlockwise the same sign
-TaRp+TbRp=Ip\alphap Eulers equation for pulley
makes clockwise +ve
Tb - Mrg = Mrar Newtons second law on rod.
makes up +ve
-TbL - Irαr = -Lw2 Eulers equation on the rod at the centre of gravity.
Makes anticlockwise +ve and ... a couple of problems here.
The rod is rotating about an endpoint so you need to use the parallel axis theorem.
The Lw2 term is a centripetal acceleration, which at this point is horizontal. It is supplied by the axle and has nothing to do with the tension.
 
Thanks guys!
By working through the sign troubles and getting rid of the Lw^2 term, the solution was achieved. Your help is appreciated greatly, and i guess ill need to work on sign conventions before my exam.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top