How can I solve for a vector in a tensor equation involving dot products?

zephyr5050
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm currently trying to work through some issues I'm having with tensor and vector analysis. I have an equation of the form
$$\textbf{a} \bullet \textbf{b} = \textbf{c} \bullet \textbf{d}$$
where all quantities here are vectors. I want to solve for ##\textbf{b}## by finding an equation of the form
$$\textbf{b} = \overline{\textbf{T}} \bullet \textbf{d}$$
where ##\overline{\textbf{T}}## is a tensor. However I'm not sure the proper mathematical procedure to go about this. Any suggestions?

Homework Equations



That's what I'm here for.

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. You can't possibly do that without imposing more constraints on your vector:
In tensor language, the vectors are contracted on both sides so you can't "solve" for b.
This may be confusing because a⋅b looks like a vector expression but it's really a scalar; if you want to solve for a vector you need a vector expression.
Look at the simplest example in 2 dimensions:
a⋅b = cd ⇔a1b1 + a2b2 = c1d1 + c2d2
You see that you would need two equations to solve for the two variables b1 and b2 , and for every additional dimension you need an additional constraint...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top