How can the density, area, and velocity be related in a cyclic fluid flow?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between density, area, and velocity in cyclic fluid flow, highlighting the challenge posed by unsteady flow conditions. Participants note that the equation (Density)x(Area1)x(Velocity1)=(Density)x(Area2)x(Velocity2) may not apply due to the changing control volume over time. The cyclic nature of the flow, described as sinusoidal, raises questions about the applicability of steady flow assumptions. Some contributors suggest using the mass conservation equation, as the sound propagation time is significantly shorter than the oscillation period. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of analyzing unsteady fluid dynamics in this context.
doctordoom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/4882/stumped.png

So from the above question I presume that the relation (Density)x(Area1)x(Velocity1)=(Density)x(Area2)x(Velocity2), cannot be applied due to the flow being unsteady and thus the control volume changing with time.

I've read up about steady in the mean flow conditions and since the flow alteration is cyclic (sin wave) that might be applied.

Other than that I'm stumped.

Can anyone out there please give me some advice on this!

-Many thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's nothing but a matter of confusion from the wording of the problem. Use you equations for velocity for both the entrance and exit.

From each velocity equation, take the derivative with respect to time to find the acceleration of each. The accelerations will be different as implied.
 
Thank you for your response. I still believe there is a major catch to this question, since it's unsteady flow and hence the control volume boundary fluctuates.

Anyone else with ideas. I've been looking through textbooks and can only find a question with a straight pipe that's similar to this!

Please help!
 
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.

Thank you so much for that explanation.

Regards.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top