How can the density, area, and velocity be related in a cyclic fluid flow?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between density, area, and velocity in cyclic fluid flow, highlighting the challenge posed by unsteady flow conditions. Participants note that the equation (Density)x(Area1)x(Velocity1)=(Density)x(Area2)x(Velocity2) may not apply due to the changing control volume over time. The cyclic nature of the flow, described as sinusoidal, raises questions about the applicability of steady flow assumptions. Some contributors suggest using the mass conservation equation, as the sound propagation time is significantly shorter than the oscillation period. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of analyzing unsteady fluid dynamics in this context.
doctordoom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/4882/stumped.png

So from the above question I presume that the relation (Density)x(Area1)x(Velocity1)=(Density)x(Area2)x(Velocity2), cannot be applied due to the flow being unsteady and thus the control volume changing with time.

I've read up about steady in the mean flow conditions and since the flow alteration is cyclic (sin wave) that might be applied.

Other than that I'm stumped.

Can anyone out there please give me some advice on this!

-Many thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's nothing but a matter of confusion from the wording of the problem. Use you equations for velocity for both the entrance and exit.

From each velocity equation, take the derivative with respect to time to find the acceleration of each. The accelerations will be different as implied.
 
Thank you for your response. I still believe there is a major catch to this question, since it's unsteady flow and hence the control volume boundary fluctuates.

Anyone else with ideas. I've been looking through textbooks and can only find a question with a straight pipe that's similar to this!

Please help!
 
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.

Thank you so much for that explanation.

Regards.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top