How can you integrate a vector without decomposing it in x and y components?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate Vector
AI Thread Summary
Integrating a vector without decomposing it into x and y components is possible by treating the unit vector as constant if its direction does not change over the integration range. In the discussed scenario, the electric field at x=0 can be calculated using the formula \(\vec{E} = \int \frac{k \lambda dx}{x^2} \vec{u}\), where \(\vec{u}\) is the direction of the electric field. The unit vector \(\vec{u}\) is directed negatively along the x-axis, simplifying the integration process. If the direction remains constant, the unit vector can be factored out of the integral, allowing for a scalar integral to be computed. This approach streamlines the calculation while maintaining vector integrity.
mad
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hello, I just wanted to know if you can integrate a vector, and if so, how.
Here is a problem: A charged piece of metal of linear density 2 * 10^-6 * x , between x=2 and x=5.
I found its charge by integrating.. and it is 21 micro C.

Now that's what I want to know: calculate the electric field at x=0
I know that \vec{E} = \int{} d \vec{E}

but in my physics book, it says I have to decompose it in E_x or {E_y} and integrate. But since I hate working without vectors, do you think there's a way to integrate without decomposing it in x and y, like something like this..:
\vec{E} = \int{} \frac{k dq }{r^2} \vec{u} = \vec{E} = \int{} \frac{k \lambda dx }{x^2} \vec{u}

Is there a way to do this? My teacher hasn't started this topic yet, I'm just curious.
Thanks a lot !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mad said:
Hello, I just wanted to know if you can integrate a vector, and if so, how.
Here is a problem: A charged piece of metal of linear density 2 * 10^-6 * x , between x=2 and x=5.
I found its charge by integrating.. and it is 21 micro C.

Now that's what I want to know: calculate the electric field at x=0
I know that \vec{E} = \int{} d \vec{E}

but in my physics book, it says I have to decompose it in E_x or {E_y} and integrate. But since I hate working without vectors, do you think there's a way to integrate without decomposing it in x and y, like something like this..:
\vec{E} = \int{} \frac{k dq \vec{u}}{r^2} = \vec{E} = \int{} \frac{k \lambda dx \vec{u}}{x^2}
Is there a way to do this? My teacher hasn't started this topic yet, I'm just curious.
Thanks a lot !

What is the direction of the unit vector \vec{u} ?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
What is the direction of the unit vector \vec{u} ?

Daniel.
It is -i , since they ask the electric field at x=0 . Is there a reason you are asking this?
 
Yes,i wanted to know whether it was constant or not.If it is,then u can take it outta the integral and compute the "scalar" integral (which yields the component of \vec{E} along the direction of \vec{u})...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes,i wanted to know whether it was constant or not.If it is,then u can take it outta the integral and compute the "scalar" integral (which yields the component of \vec{E} along the direction of \vec{u})...

Daniel.
k \lambda \vec{i} \int \frac{dx}{x^2}

You mean this? We have just started integrals in math., so I may have confused some things.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top