How Can You Simplify General Relativity Equations Without Using Tensors?

Vardonir
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Essentially, my adviser just told me to get the equation, then expand it so that it doesn't have any tensors. That's it. Just get rid of the tensors.

He said that this would be normally found in some textbook...? I've searched a lot of books, but I never saw anything that didn't have the equations in tensor form.

Homework Equations



I got Gμv = 8πTμv.

Reading further, I also got the following:
Gμv = Rμv - (1/2)gμvR
R = gαβRαβ

And I also found the Ricci tensor in terms of the Christoffel symbols but that's too long to type.

The Attempt at a Solution



What I tried doing is just plug in values of the greek indices and treat each one as a separate equation. However, when I use gαβ = diag(-1, 1, 1, 1), the left hand side always becomes zero.

Is there any other value of the metric tensor that I can use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The whole point of the Einstein tensor is that it is trivial in flat space, where there is no gravity. What you get for the Einstein tensor depends upon the metric tensor which, in turn, depends upon the distribution of mass in space. What situation are you assuming? You are trying to find the Einstein tensor for what space?
 
HallsofIvy said:
The whole point of the Einstein tensor is that it is trivial in flat space, where there is no gravity. What you get for the Einstein tensor depends upon the metric tensor which, in turn, depends upon the distribution of mass in space. What situation are you assuming? You are trying to find the Einstein tensor for what space?

I wasn't really given that much information, aside from "find the equations in terms of x, y, z, and t." I'm guessing Euclidean space, then.
 
I wouldn't plug in anything for the metric. Just leave the formulas in terms of g_{tt}, g_{tx} and so on.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top