How Do Boundary Conditions Affect Solutions in a Half-Infinite Square Well?

hootna
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm considering a square well which is finite on one side (left) and infinite on the other (right).

So the wave function is:

Left-most region: Ae^(ikx) + Be^(-ikx)
Inside the well: Csin(lx) + D(cos(lx))
Right-most region: 0

where k and l are known.

The problem is with boundary conditions: On the left, we have both (continuity and continuity of derivative), but on the right we only have one (continuity). So we have 3 equations to solve for 4 variables... what gives?

If the context helps, I'm trying to figure out the probability that particles entering from the left in region 1 will be reflected back (i.e., the ratio of the probability flux in region 1 traveling to the left to the incident flux in region 1 traveling to the right).

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Thomas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Put the infinite wall at x = 0. Now, what can you say about the wave function inside the well? :wink:
 
Think about this, make a mirror image of the well and think about the finite well. Draw the first few wave functions and really think hard about what you are drawing and the answer will pop out at you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top