How do I find di_L(0)/dt for a second order RLC circuit after the switch opens?

AI Thread Summary
To find di_L(0)/dt for a second-order RLC circuit after the switch opens, the initial current is -4 and the capacitor voltage is 8. The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's laws to determine voltage signs and relationships in the circuit. The correct signs for voltage changes depend on the assumed direction of current flow, with positive changes corresponding to current entering the positive terminal of components. A state variable approach, such as the Laplace Transform, is recommended for managing initial conditions effectively. Understanding the signs and relationships in the circuit is crucial for solving the equations accurately.
Jebus_Chris
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
http://imgur.com/6aAMV

So I need to find the current labeled as a function of time. THe switch opens at t=0 and I drew the circuit after the switch opens.

I found the initial current to be -4 and the voltage on the capacitor to be 8.


I'm having trouble trying to find di_L(0)/dt. I know you just need to do a simple loop around the whole circuit, v_c+v_l+v_r=0. The problem is I don't know the signs of the voltages, or rather I don't know what they should be. I get either di_L(0)/dt = -40/10, -24/10.
Same for finding the second order eq.
1/c\int i_c+ L di_L/dt + 8 i_L = 0 Simple loop around the outside. Are signs correct?
and
i_c - i_L - V_2/2 = 0 Node equation at the top node, V is equal to the voltage across the inductor and 8 ohm resistor so substitute

i_c - i_L - 1/2 (Ldi_L/dt + 8i_L)=0
Substitute the third into the first, do algebra, and find answer.
That part should be easy. What I need to know is whether the signs are correct. That is, when doing kichoff mesh and nodes how do you know what is positive and negative [or rather what side the element should be placed on]?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The signs of the potential changes are determined by the assumed direction of the current. The components of capacitance and inductance have their equations defined assuming a current directed into the component and the "+" reference at the terminal where the current enters.

attachment.php?attachmentid=53095&stc=1&d=1353273440.gif


Note, for example, that in the above figure for the inductor that a small positive going change in current "dI" results in a positive change in the voltage across the inductor, thus giving the equation V = L dI/dt. Similarly for the capacitor, a positive current flowing into the capacitor increases the potential across the capacitor over time.

For this problem I would probably solve it using a state variable (Laplace Transform) approach, since it handles all the initial condition details easily. Having a good table of Laplace transforms helps :smile:
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 520
I think I finally understand this + and -.
I picked the current going to the right around the loop. Labeled each element with a plus and minus, current entered the plus so each one is positive. Blah blah balh, it all worked out.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top