How do I prove Lorentz Invariance using 4-vectors?

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


I'm asked to prove that Et - p⋅r = E't' - p'⋅r'

Homework Equations


t = γ (t' + ux')
x = γ (x' + ut')
y = y'
z = z'

E = γ (E' + up'x)
px = γ (p'x + uE')
py = p'y
pz = p'z

The Attempt at a Solution


Im still trying to figure out 4 vectors. I get close to the solution but I have some values hanging around.
For the first two terms, E and t, i just multiple them out.
(γ (E' + up'x))(γ (t' + ux') )

Next I work with the p and r. The way i understand them is that that p is equal to the three different equations i have listed for px,py, and pz. And the same thing for r but with x,y, and z. I am guessing that because i don't a lorentz transformation formula for just p or r.

I then multiply px with x, py with y, and pz with z. adding the products of each along the way.

am i on the right track? I start canceling terms but ultimately I'm left with a γ2ut'uE' and γ2ux'up'. I'm also left with a bunch of γ2's.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i just figured it out. the squared gamma factor helps me get rid of the left over terms. i forgot that gamma was something more than just a variable.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top