How Do I Solve These Quantum Tunneling Problems?

nhk150709
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how to solve these problems.
Picture is attached.

attachment.php?attachmentid=23881&d=1266889587.gif

An electron with energy E is incident on a barrier of height U0 and total width L. It enters the barrier at x = 0, from the left.

1) For an electron with energy E = 6 eV and a barrier of height U0 = 12 eV, at what penetration depth into the barrier will the probability density fall to 1/4 of its value at the surface x = 0 ? Assume the barrier width L is sufficiently large that the in-barrier wavefunction is well approximated by a single exponential, i.e., negligible reflections from the x = L interface. [For an electron, mec2 = 0.511 MeV.]

0.055 nm
0.110 nm
0.282 nm
0.159 nm
0.319 nm
2) What is the probability density for this electron at the depth 3 times as large as the answer to the previous question, compared to its value at x = 0 ? Assume that the electron is still inside the barrier at this depth.

1/12
(1/4) 2
(1/4) 35) For the same barrier width L, if the height of the barrier and the energy of the electron are both reduced by a factor of 4, U1 = 0.25 U0 and E1 = 0.25 E, what is the transmission coefficient T1?

T1 = 10-8/4= 0.25 x 10-8
T1 = 10-8
T1 = 4 x 10-8
T1 = 2 x 10-4
The problem does not provide enough information to answer this question.
 

Attachments

  • showme.pl.gif
    showme.pl.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 628
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The general approach is to solve Schrodinger equation for 3 regions:
x < 0;
0 < x < L;
x > L;
and then build the solution for whole space, using wave function and it's derivative continuity. This allows to answer 5).

For large L this procedure gives:

<br /> \left|\frac{\psi(x)}{\psi(0)}\right|^2 = \exp(-2\alpha x).<br />

That's enough to answer the question 2). For 1) you need to know \alpha.

The procedure described above is not convenient for complex barriers. The transfer-matrix method is more effective and gives the transmission coefficient explicitly.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top